The last time I responded to a post on this subject I got banned so I will start this post a little differently.
The first and primary reason for the existence of our federal government is to protect our borders from all outside invaders. An incursion by members of a foreign military who are armed and who detain our federal agents at gunpoint should automatically trigger an armed response from our government. If a person is held at gunpoint then we can also automatically assume that they are being held under threat of death so deadly force is instantly into play.
No Law enforcement officer would just let a bank robber run away and nether should the military or federal agents let these invaders just run away. The have committed a grave offence against our government, our sovereignty, and our people.
These invaders should be cut off from retreat, and apprehended. It these same invaders chose to resist using deadly force then the military and/or federal agents should respond in kind. All necessary firepower should be brought to bare insuring that the criminal invaders are not be allowed to escape. If there is authorized use of deadly force and causalities have occurred all wounded should be given medical attention and all foreign military personnel should be treated per the Geneva Convention as mandated for POW’s.
If fatalities are sustained the battle scene should be preserved and secured for further investigation. True and exact images should be accomplished in mass and well distributed to the world media so that they can ascertain exactly what happened, where it happened, and what the true implications of the invasion and the armed response to that military invasion really are.
Anything less than a response of this nature by our government is a total and complete failure to uphold the oath that each and every soldier, sailor, marine, and airman take when they raise their right hand and take the oath of enlistment, that each member of congress, and the executive branch pledged by oath when sworn into their elected position.
I wholeheartedly demand that deadly force be used when necessary to protect our borders from the armed invasion by a military force or drug runners!!!!!!! I am in good company in this demand because it is also what the constitution of our great nation demands!!!!!
The only pertinent question that remains is why aren’t those who have pledged before God to protect our people, our sovereignty, and our borders from foreign-armed invasion doing what they are swore to do?
Is that better?
Engaged forces have the right of pursuit and as far as I'm concerned "the world" can take my word for the whys and hows of a map coordinate and the only agency with jurisdiction would be a depoliticized military court.
BTTT