You are twisting things, FK. I am surprised. Grabbing at straws? My comment was referencing Gov.Palin's welcoming address to the AIP. I never said she was a secesisonist. I have no clue what Mr. Palin's attitude is regarding Independence. But he was a member of a Party that was founded by an Anti-American and remind s true to him.
You said: "So, Alaskan secessionist traitors are better than Communists? May I quote you on that?" Since the whole point of your many posts on this clearly appears to be to link the Palins to the AIP, what else can anyone think but that you are calling the Palins secessionists? If you don't think you know then why in the world are you working so hard to try to establish a link that MEANS something? Are you just throwing out all this stuff for fun? Please tell us what you think you reasonably know about the Palins being "secessionist traitors", as you used that term.
There is a "new" Black Panther organization and as far as I know it has not reached for violence as a means of their political ascent.
That's right, but I have seen their leaders interviewed. For some reason Hannity has them on a lot. Anyway, they are still militant, but without overt violence being publicly encouraged. IOW, I think they have the same philosophy as the old Panthers, but they're smart enough not to go under the way the first ones did. There is still no comparison to the AIP.
I am really, really trying to get to the bottom of this issue, because there are rumors, false information, and above all silence from the Palins on the topic. But it sounds to me that instead of being suspicious of the silence you seem to use it to rely, really unconditionally like her.
Oh come on. There are 10,000 questions waiting for her out there. If she doesn't answer them all at once you say she is avoiding the issues? How about give her a chance? :) My guess would be that Alaskans know that there is no there, there about this AIP thing so it's never been a big deal. (She obviously got elected Governor with that info out there.) It's fine if some want to ask her about it now, but there are also other issues she should probably be dealing with too at this time, don't you think? My instinct tells me that she will knock any question about the AIP right out of the park.
I am saying that it is a Party that advocates disloyalty to the United States.
Well, they have a funny way of advertising that. As I said, the NUMBER ONE platform they list is allegiance to the Constitution of the United States.
It advocates the right to secession by vote. It doesn't provide a reliable number of how many favor Independence but reason tells you that if they didn't stand to gain something from this vote, they wouldn't ask for it.
They are trying to prove a point. When they advocate taking up arms, then you've got something. Those members who are pushing this are harmless, and it's NOT in the platform. I WILL admit that the website as a whole is a bit schizophrenic about what they really want, but if it's not in the platform, then it's not in the platform. In any event whatever you imagine anyone expecting from any imagined vote that will never happen IS IRRELEVANT to the Palins, or Sarah running for VP.
With so many questions out there, Palin has to 'triage' all of them and answer those that matter. Those that are insignificant she SHOULD ignore. This is one that should be ignored once it gets a quick response. They gave a quick response. They had a quick denial from the AIP itself. Case closed so far as Palin goes. Why dwell on that which has been satisfactorily answered?
So far as sitting down with the "Hate Sarah" press, I'd simply refuse to sit down with any news organization that had unfairly mentioned slander, innuendo, or other attack UNTIL they publicly acknowledged their slander. It would really put the MSM in the corner. They would scream for interviews, and Palin would show clips of them going after Piper, Bristol, or a strong female with their unsavory attacks. She'd say, "I can't trust you. When you publicly apologize, and allow me to balance your inquisitor panels to insure balance, then I'll sit down with you." I think women everyone, and Americans, in general, would stand and cheer. They hate the media almost as much as they hate the current Congress.