With so many questions out there, Palin has to 'triage' all of them and answer those that matter. Those that are insignificant she SHOULD ignore. This is one that should be ignored once it gets a quick response. They gave a quick response. They had a quick denial from the AIP itself. Case closed so far as Palin goes. Why dwell on that which has been satisfactorily answered?
So far as sitting down with the "Hate Sarah" press, I'd simply refuse to sit down with any news organization that had unfairly mentioned slander, innuendo, or other attack UNTIL they publicly acknowledged their slander. It would really put the MSM in the corner. They would scream for interviews, and Palin would show clips of them going after Piper, Bristol, or a strong female with their unsavory attacks. She'd say, "I can't trust you. When you publicly apologize, and allow me to balance your inquisitor panels to insure balance, then I'll sit down with you." I think women everyone, and Americans, in general, would stand and cheer. They hate the media almost as much as they hate the current Congress.
That's a good point. Those whose agendas are to discredit her would love to see her spend a lot of time chasing their rabbits down illogical holes. She should give one answer and leave it at that. The Daily KOS crowd will always rant, but the American people will see through it.
So far as sitting down with the "Hate Sarah" press, I'd simply refuse to sit down with any news organization that had unfairly mentioned slander, innuendo, or other attack UNTIL they publicly acknowledged their slander.
I go back and forth on this. I agree with the sentiment, but then no one will see her. Given that she is now a comparative unknown, she probably needs the exposure more than they need the Republican VP (whom they hate). In her shoes, I might give every network one shot and see how it goes. If she just starts out refusing then all the people will hear the networks say is "We asked, but she refused. What's she hiding?".