Posted on 08/29/2008 5:56:41 PM PDT by Checkers
McCain has thrown the election. It is clear now with his choice for Vice President that he has no desire to win in November. Why else would he chose an inexperienced woman, whose only apparent qualification is that she won a beauty pageant in the 1980s? Why else would he refuse to say Barack Hussein Obama’s middle name? Why else would he run an ad praising Obama and congratulating him for winning the nomination?
If McCain had chosen Mitt Romney, a man with real leadership ability, real charisma, and real experience, he might have stood a chance. He could have made up for his lack of energy in confronting his opponent, his useless pandering to liberals, and his refusal to expose Obama’s leftism and inexperience. Instead he trumped inexperience with more inexperience. Obama, for all his far-left socialism, picked a running mate who is perceived as giving the ticket more experience. McCain, in defiance of all logic, undermined his strong suit by selecting a political neophyte who waters down his key advantage over Obama.
Of course, I can hear the calls already. Mike, you should give her a chance, she’s a real conservative. Mike, he’s just doing this because he knows he has to pander to win. Mike, isn’t it great that he picked a woman. Wrong, wrong, wrong. Picking someone because of their sex instead of their ability is the same kind of affirmative action insanity that the Democrats have shoved down our throats. We don’t want a panderer, we want a president. If he had chosen a woman who was a real nationalist with a real resume, I would have said, “Right on, John.” But McCain has dropped the ball, thrown in the towel, and raised the white flag. And a generation of Americans will pay for his
(Excerpt) Read more at michaelsavage.com ...
“’Mature’ people can disagree with Savage”
Can?
I don’t need your permission to disagree with the Weiner.
It don't make a lick of sense being on this thread. We can continue over there. That way others can join in if they wish, of course.
Checkers has been banned from harassing us on the Savage thread, that's why he's stuck over here, as a result his poppa, lormand has to do it, lol!
Though I did have a polite discussion with one of the gang. He convinced me that the item we discussed belonged on the list as I had no explanation for it, nuanced or otherwise.
My ego defers to truth. I am blessed that way.
Truth is the most important ingredient, the crucial element in any honest debate. Isn't that the advantage Free Republic has over the rest? I thought so.
“My question to you was, “why would you say about me ‘But, then, you knew that.’ accusing me of knowing that the list you guys post over and over is wholly accurate. See #591”
You are ignoring it a second time, I believe...”
Since you claim to listen to Weiner, I assume you know the list is true.
That’s why I wrote ‘But, then, you knew that.’
Got it?
In reply #610 I restated the "But, then, you knew that." quote from reply #591. In the very next reply #592 I believe is where I said that you favored the Dubai / seaports deal.
That's the answer. I responded in kind. It's as simple as that.
I have listened to the Savage show for probably 12 years of the 13 that he's had his own show, virtually everyday and always for the full three hours, I doubt that I've missed more than 10 live broadcasts -- in recent years I skip when he has BO (best of).
Contrary to your apparent assumption to the contrary .. that is exactly why I know that not everything on the list is true. That is my personal belief, my personal life.
I wrote “But, then, you knew that.” because I assumed you had an IQ above room temperature. I may have be mistaken in my assuption.
If that seems a harsh assessment, so be it. I’m giving you the benefit of doubt.
The other possiblity is you are not being honest when you say:
“I have listened to the Savage show for probably 12 years of the 13 that he’s had his own show, virtually everyday and always for the full three hours, I doubt that I’ve missed more than 10 live broadcasts — in recent years I skip when he has BO (best of).
Contrary to your apparent assumption to the contrary .. that is exactly why I know that not everything on the list is true.”
If you’ve listened that much to Mike Wiener, The List will sound very familiar. And, yeah, I think you know that already, since you’ve failed to point to one incorrect item on the list.
So which is it? Room temp IQ or dishonesty.
Your call.
“But unlike the sudden swarm of mau-mauing Levinites I would not deny Dr. Savage his rights to express his opinion on the radio, ranked number three in the nation.”
Can you point me to any post advocating Weiner’s “rights” be denied?
From looking at the Weiner Nation thread, it looks like Weiner really got the crap kicked out of him since he went on his anti-Palin tear.
He’ll mind his “p’s and Q”s for a while and watch his mouth, but sooner or later, he’ll say something despicable...
...he can’t help it.
“Savage says they all get GOP talking points daily, one can only wonder what talk show hosts (Rush, Levin, Hannity,) uses them to base their shows’ content on...”
206 posted on Monday, September 08, 2008 4:12:13 PM by whatisthetruth
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2075590/posts?page=206#206
Did Weiner really say that?
207 posted on Monday, September 08, 2008 4:17:41 PM by xcamel
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2075590/posts?page=207#207
xcamel -
whatisthetruth wants you to stop telling the Truth about Weiner, but you're not cooperating. lol
Is that a “yes” or a “no”?
Is that a “yes” or a “no”?
Yes and No, LMAO!
“Savage says they all get GOP talking points daily, one can only wonder what talk show hosts (Rush, Levin, Hannity,) uses them to base their shows’ content on...”
206 posted on Monday, September 08, 2008 4:12:13 PM by whatisthetruth
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2075590/posts?page=206#206
Did Weiner really say that?
Maybe yes, maybe no, lol!
Weiner seems to be dying out:
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/savage/index?tab=articles
Time for him to say something obnoxious.
Oh noooooooooooooooo! If Savage dies out then you die out, pray that it ain't so.....
Savage complaining about his audience? He feels sorry for them (us)? Sometimes he acknowledges the IQ of his audience but this? I like his independent thinking but turning on his loyal and intelligent audience - reflects badly on him, makes him look like a little Hitler.
40 posted on Friday, September 12, 2008 3:22:49 PM by Jim 0216
Is Savage really attacking his audience?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.