Posted on 08/29/2008 5:56:41 PM PDT by Checkers
McCain has thrown the election. It is clear now with his choice for Vice President that he has no desire to win in November. Why else would he chose an inexperienced woman, whose only apparent qualification is that she won a beauty pageant in the 1980s? Why else would he refuse to say Barack Hussein Obama’s middle name? Why else would he run an ad praising Obama and congratulating him for winning the nomination?
If McCain had chosen Mitt Romney, a man with real leadership ability, real charisma, and real experience, he might have stood a chance. He could have made up for his lack of energy in confronting his opponent, his useless pandering to liberals, and his refusal to expose Obama’s leftism and inexperience. Instead he trumped inexperience with more inexperience. Obama, for all his far-left socialism, picked a running mate who is perceived as giving the ticket more experience. McCain, in defiance of all logic, undermined his strong suit by selecting a political neophyte who waters down his key advantage over Obama.
Of course, I can hear the calls already. Mike, you should give her a chance, she’s a real conservative. Mike, he’s just doing this because he knows he has to pander to win. Mike, isn’t it great that he picked a woman. Wrong, wrong, wrong. Picking someone because of their sex instead of their ability is the same kind of affirmative action insanity that the Democrats have shoved down our throats. We don’t want a panderer, we want a president. If he had chosen a woman who was a real nationalist with a real resume, I would have said, “Right on, John.” But McCain has dropped the ball, thrown in the towel, and raised the white flag. And a generation of Americans will pay for his
(Excerpt) Read more at michaelsavage.com ...
It don't make a lick of sense being on this thread. We can continue over there. That way others can join in if they wish, of course.
If she should escape Washington's glare for the quietude and joys of rural Alaska and motherhood, Romney can still take up the reins.
“can you prove Savage’s motive was “a blatant attempt to damage the GOP Senate Campaign.” “
Did you hear Weiner’s suckface interview with Chuckie?
“You have a right to post...”
Hey your Highness, I don’t get my “rights” from you.
“But unlike the sudden swarm of mau-mauing Levinites I would not deny Dr. Savage his rights to express his opinion on the radio, ranked number three in the nation.”
Can you point me to any post advocating Weiner’s “rights” be denied?
You wrote:”You approved handing our sea ports over to a government controlled Dubai company.”
See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2070907/posts?page=592#592
I asked you to back up the assertion you made about me. You did not.
Why did you write that about me?
“Wait a minute! It just occurred to me. You’re responding to my replies on the Savage daily thread.”
You catch on fast.
To: lormand; All
Let start a thread with the reasons we dont like lormond, everyday. If thats his real name.....
42 posted on Friday, September 05, 2008 3:19:49 PM by
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2075590/posts?page=42#42
To: ßuddaßudd
If you don’t, you are a coward and a liberal. Do it, I dare you.
171 posted on 09/06/2008 7:10:32 AM PDT by lormand
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2075590/posts?page=171#171
Where’s the List?
To: lormand
What a POS yo are, you talk big from behind a keyboard dont you? Name calling?
Grow up!
173 posted on Saturday, September 06, 2008 7:22:44 AM by ßuddaßudd
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2075590/posts?page=173#173
You stay classy, Weinerfan.
It was just a comment.
That terminates my interest in this "discussion."
You're fanatical about this wiener thing. Mark Levin seems to me beside himself with it. I like his show and listen everyday (delayed). We need more like him.
Mark Levin is a gifted user of contumelies. IMO your posts suggest that you are pretty good at it too.
Mark Levin is persistent. You are persistent.
Mark Levin is a Republican and obviously knows a lot about Richard Nixon.
Mark Levin loves pets especially dogs.
Richard Nixon's dog's name was Checkers.
Of course all I can do is speculate....
You should be flattered being compare to The Great One if you ain't him. :)
So I read the additional posts above.
Anyway, I see that you repeated your question asking why did I say that you favored the Dubai / seaports deal. I responded the first time you asked.
To wit, I asked you why would you say about me "But, then, you knew that." accusing me of knowing that the list you guys post over and over is wholly accurate. See #591
That honestly is the reason I said that you favored the Dubai / seaports deal. That's the answer. I knew that it's useless to ask for a retraction from you so I responded in kind. It's as simple as that. My "source" is the same as yours.
I don't have a TV so it took me awhile to catch on -- until I heard some really puzzling and disturbing audio from a TV show, NBC I think. Then I realized...
We're being treated to a copycat Keith Olbermann show! Savage and little ol' us are the targets of his copycats' invective and implied "worst person in the world" insult -- like Olbermann his copycats foolishly think that being selected is an insult.
Well, I swanny! Lookie that! and all to goad fellow FReepers into saying something rash to where there are not many "Weinerbots" left . . . others have already been banned for reacting like "idiots" thus violating FR policy. Didn't they recognize the Olbermannbros tactics? (Not that the copycats like Olbermann but they do act like his brothers.)
“Mark Levin is a gifted user of contumelies. IMO your posts suggest that you are pretty good at it too.
Mark Levin is persistent. You are persistent.
Mark Levin is a Republican and obviously knows a lot about Richard Nixon.
Mark Levin loves pets especially dogs.
Richard Nixon’s dog’s name was Checkers.
Of course all I can do is speculate....
You should be flattered being compare to The Great One if you ain’t him. :)”
I am flattered, but I am not Mark Levin.
“My “source” is the same as yours.”
My source is Mike Weiner. No quotation marks needed.
What’s your source?
If you're implying that Keith O and Mike Weiner-o have much in common, I agree. That both provide show prep and an echo chamber for the circle jerk Conservative-haters. I think Olbermann is much more out in the open about his anti-Conservative fervor than the Weinermanm.
Weiner claims to have written a book called “The Enemy Within.” To the extent that he's mistakenly associated with Conservatism, that's exactly what he is...
“What’s more, he’s a real human being.”
181 posted on Saturday, September 06, 2008 9:41:20 AM by VictoryGal
See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2075590/posts?page=181#181
The radio-host Mike “Savage” is a not a real human being. It is a made-up persona.
“Could I respond to your little list? Oh, sure. Some things I disagree with, some I agree with...”
181 posted on Saturday, September 06, 2008 9:41:20 AM by VictoryGal
See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2075590/posts?page=181#181
Facts and Truth are Facts and Truth whether or not you “agree or disagree” .
Nothing on the list has been refuted and anybody who has ever heard Mr. Weiner knows this.
“Most ‘mature’ people disagree with Savage...”
184 posted on Saturday, September 06, 2008 3:50:57 PM by whatisthetruth
See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2075590/posts?page=184#184
Yes, but what’s with the quotation marks?
“blah blah blah blah blah
you should have better things to do with your time old man. See you on Monday... “
194 posted on Sunday, September 07, 2008 6:50:58 AM by ßuddaßudd
See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2075590/posts?page=194#194
Where’s the list?
Gee, Chuckles, do I have to spell out EVERYTHING I say for you
Comprende now?
He told you that I knew that the items on your list are true. Really? Wow.
My question to you was, "why would you say about me 'But, then, you knew that.' accusing me of knowing that the list you guys post over and over is wholly accurate. See #591"
You are ignoring it a second time, I believe. But that's okay. There are other things at play here. See below.
I've answered your questions honestly. I don't need badgerin'. I don't have use for no stinkin' badgerin', mon. :)
You guys are the Olbermann copycats, IMO.
After learning of your Olbermannbros' scheme and with all the respect I can scrap up, I say to you: I have answered your questions honestly. I no longer require clarifications from you guys. I have it all here.
I seems to me that you are attempting to provoke angry responses from fellow FReepers with the purpose of getting them kicked off the site. That is my opinion, it seems clear to me. Badger all you want but that is it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.