See post 38 on this thread to understand why some of us support Romney. 668 has said very well what I have long struggled to say.
____________________________________________
Said what ???
That he doesnt trust Romney as far as he can kick him
BUT Romney should be given control of our country ????
ROFLMBO
Well, I’m glad you’re amused. And you probably need some assistance losing a little off your b. If laughing is the means to that end, more power to you; and I mean that genuinely. People are too uptight here, so often looking to attack someone. You’re rolling on the floor laughing your b off. Hillary ought to try that method; nothing else appears to have worked.
Your interpretation of what 668 said is reductionist, but if it helps you lose weight - strategically, no less - all while having a grand old time, you just keep right on being reductionist.
Go McCain!
Mitt is it!
Do you think a vice president has “control of our country?”
I should elaborate before I leave for dinner...
TN, I believe that Machiavelli was mostly right. I believe that realpolitik mostly works better, or does less damage than any other approach.
Saints don’t run for office. Jesus was offered a principality, turned it down. (And you remember who offered it?)
We don’t have enough good men, but we have good enough men in McCain and Romney (and some other possible veep choices). I’m also at peace with the prospect of a McCain/Romney ticket because they are both seasoned and mature men, who seem to me to be keenly aware of their own flaws. As phony as Romney may be, I think he knows he’s got some work to do in that area, because he’s lived, and because he believes in God more than he believes in Romney. I think if he ever finds himself President, some horrible day, the first thing he’ll do is not sweat bullets, but pray; I don’t doubt his faith.
So they’re imperfect fellows, yes, and they will govern imperfectly. But I trust they won’t make rookie mistakes, which nowadays could be fatal to millions.
Hope that clears it up for ya! :)