Replies

Picked up this comment by CJ today on Michelle Malkin's blog:

On August 27th, 2008 at 10:49 am, I’m not convinced that it’s the Ayers-Obama link that the campaign wants to hush up. Oh, they’d like that to go away, but I think there may be something more damaging. BO was Chairman of the Board of the CAC, which had a cool $100+ million to enact hopeandchange in some of Chicago’s worst schools. So, after blowing through this cool $100+ million, where’s the hopeandchange??? The kidlets who had the opportunity to experience this $100+ million of hopeandchange are now adults. Did their schools start graduating a higher percentage of students? Did test scores rise? Did more students attend (and the all-important statistic, graduate from) college? What kind of education can a cool $100+ million buy? The average cost a private school is about 5K/year. If that cool $100+ million had been used to award scholarships to poor students stuck in the worst of these schools, a couple of thousand of them could have attended private schools — for all 12 years of their childhood. BO was ultimately responsible for the cool $100+ million. How was it spent? Who was hired? Why don’t we see the promised hopeandchange? And most importantly, if Barak Obama was a failure in his ONLY executive endeavor, why would anyone even consider him fit to run a country??? And if the American people start thinking about that last question …

This is the first time I have heard how much money may have been involved over which Ayers and BO might have had accessible to them or whatever...??

Yes, we are all responsible for getting the word out. I’m sending this link to everyone I know.

Obama Ayers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNkclbvuc9w

(Thanks again to ishabibble in post 41! This is the same video as viewed on the blog he referenced.)