Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BibChr

She is 75% pro-life, mostly on stem cell issues (which is not a pass for her). Still, I think he needs someone a little younger & less Washington.


15 posted on 08/25/2008 5:27:28 AM PDT by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Blogger
How do you figure? She's "pro-choice," which is to say pro-abortion. She was pro-babykilling long before stem cells was ever an issue.

Check THIS: "A woman has a right to choose abortion, with restrictions, until viability."

She's opposed pro-life judges.

It's stupid these lame "let's screw the base" ideas keep being floated.

24 posted on 08/25/2008 5:43:45 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Blogger
"She is 75% pro-life..."

Huh? I think she would be very offended at your characterizing her proud feminist pro-choice record as 75% pro-life. She has an extensive record of supporting the election of pro-choice women of BOTH parties.

56 posted on 08/25/2008 7:08:53 AM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Blogger

She is not 75% Pro-Life. It’s just that she voted with some of the issues associated with parental rights, etc.

She openly favors a woman’s right to choose at its core.

Not acceptable.


107 posted on 08/27/2008 7:37:50 AM PDT by TitansAFC (In 2008, please vote GOP and show us that you love your country more than you hate John McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson