Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could a land swap solve the ANWR standoff?
Hot Air ^ | August 24, 2008 11:30 am | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 08/24/2008 9:29:58 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Congress has repeatedly refused to allow drilling on the 2,000 acres set aside for that purpose in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, a tiny portion of tundra in a 19-million-acre preserve.  That parcel had been created with the specific intent of extracting oil from the area when ANWR first received its federal protection, but environmentalists have continually blocked oil companies through other federal action.  Sean Parnell, the Lieutenant Governor of Alaska, has a proposal to end federal oversight on that stretch of barren land:

Sean Parnell, lieutenant governor and a Republican candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives, proposed a land swap as a way of opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

“I propose a land swap of 2,000 acres of state land to the federal government in exchange for 2,000 acres of the coastal plain in ANWR into state hands,” Parnell said at a press conference Tuesday in Fairbanks.

Parnell said he could work with Gov. Sarah Palin and the administration to identify the 2,000 acres of state land that would be traded, perhaps extending a portion of ANWR by 2,000 acres.

Could this defuse the controversy?  In a land swap, the federal government would not lose an inch of overall land. 

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: anwr; congress; drilling; electioncongress; energy; environment

1 posted on 08/24/2008 9:32:20 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gusopol3; NormsRevenge; thackney; BOBTHENAILER; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; blam; SunkenCiv; ...

fyi


2 posted on 08/24/2008 9:33:00 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Never compromise with socialists. It will come back to haunt you. We need to force them to open ANWR to drilling. We now have the opportunity to do that at the ballot box in November.


3 posted on 08/24/2008 9:42:59 AM PDT by big'ol_freeper (A vote for third party is a vote for nObama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
No.

It's not hard to understand; but it is hard to accept:

They want shortages of life-sustaining commodities.

They want our economy in the tank.

They want to fund our enemies.

See tag line.
4 posted on 08/24/2008 9:44:48 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power with a desire for evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It's all about the issue, when push comes to shove both side will compromise, more nothing is going to get done.
5 posted on 08/24/2008 9:46:00 AM PDT by org.whodat (Republicans should support the SAM Walton business model, and then drill???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
That parcel had been created with the specific intent of extracting oil from the area when ANWR first received its federal protection, but environmentalists have continually blocked oil companies through other federal action.

So we "trade" 2000 more acres to the Communist envirowackos and after they get it, they go back to some "court" and get one of their "judges" to tell us we still can't drill in ANWR. This isn't a good idea. We're dealing with anti-American/anti-capitalists here who are "trying to save the planet" by destroying America's economy and taking total control over the American people.

6 posted on 08/24/2008 9:51:21 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (A History and Science Minute.- "Climate change" has been going on for millions of years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Never assume that the Left will hold up their side of bargain in good faith.


7 posted on 08/24/2008 9:57:33 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Forget ANWR; Forget off shore—Drill Los Angeles Basin and the Hollywood Hills—only a third of the oil has been tapped and CA can get out of their depression!
8 posted on 08/24/2008 10:05:53 AM PDT by kcm.org (Drill Los Angeles--home prices will go up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

That’s not a solution.

How bout 100% of “federal” land is turned over to the state?
And for that matter, then 90% of that land is turned over to, I don’t know, actual citizens.

The feds shouldn’t own anything; they should be guests paying rent for the privilege. The amount of land “owned” by gov’ts (fed and state), that is, locked away from citizens’ with any productive use barred, is inexcusable.

Sell it all, put the money towards retiring the federal debt, and couple it with an amendment requiring spending never to exceed revenues and a 75% vote to raise any tax and a 25% to lower/remove any tax.


9 posted on 08/24/2008 10:18:15 AM PDT by BobbyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Oh... but the ANWAR tundra is special and I’m certain is just teaming with little forest creatures that will be killed or poisoned if we drill there. (sarcasm)


10 posted on 08/24/2008 10:25:07 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Fred Nerks; george76; ...

Thanks Ernest.

Heh heh... that’s what’s known as an end run... and this needs to be pushed, hard, so that the Demwits get to go on record, once again, as being against drilling and against domestic production of energy.


11 posted on 08/24/2008 10:42:30 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcm.org

Land sinkage.


12 posted on 08/24/2008 11:09:15 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Say Obama were "Pinky", Then who is "The Brain"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

An insane idea.

ANWR is ALREADY the result of a land swap.

The coastal plain (area 1002) was set aside for oil/gas exploration in a deal to double the size of ANWR with the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act.

The deal has never been upheld after the land grab was completed.


13 posted on 08/24/2008 2:01:16 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Thanks for the info.


14 posted on 08/24/2008 3:03:50 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Just change the name to the Anwar National Mosquitor Refuge.


15 posted on 08/24/2008 6:25:54 PM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson