It should be accepted law in all the United States, that video/audio recording of public officials involved in their public duties is always legal.
1 posted on
08/22/2008 10:15:23 AM PDT by
marktwain
To: marktwain
It should be accepted law in all the United States, that video/audio recording of public officials involved in their public duties is always legal. It is.
To: marktwain
“...officer Aqil Farooq leaped out, hit the camera to the ground...
Hmmmmm....Aqil Farooq.
Hmmmmm...
3 posted on
08/22/2008 10:18:45 AM PDT by
vladimir998
(Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
To: marktwain
“It should be accepted law in all the United States, that video/audio recording of public officials involved in their public duties is always legal.”
I don’t even think we should be allowed to talk about “public officials involved in their public duties”. Who in the world are we to second guess them?
4 posted on
08/22/2008 10:25:46 AM PDT by
elfman2
(TheRightReasons.net - Reasoning CONSERVATIVES without the kooks.)
To: marktwain
Farooq apologized at a disciplinary hearing. LOL, I'll bet that was a heartfelt apology..
You ever make a six year old apologize for hitting his brother? Right, dripping with sincerity.
5 posted on
08/22/2008 10:31:56 AM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
To: marktwain
video/audio recording of public officials involved in their public duties is always legal. Beyond legal, it should be encouraged.
To: marktwain
Nice to see the Brits are training their police officers after the American Swat Team model.
At least there will be consistency in trampling the citizen rights while we create this veil of legality around any particular action the police might decide to take.
As an aside: Apparently US Border Agents are under a different set of rules :-)
Cheers,
Lloyd
10 posted on
08/22/2008 11:06:03 AM PDT by
Lloyd227
(and may God bless Oriana Fallaci)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson