Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AuH2ORepublican
I said *if* Obama had been born outside the U.S. he would not be a U.S. citizen at birth.

He would unless his father was not a U.S. citizen and his mother, a U.S. citizen, had not lived in the U.S. for 10 years, 5 of which had to have been after the age of 16 and before giving birth to him.
71 posted on 08/23/2008 7:53:25 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: aruanan

Under the law as in effect when Obama was born, a child with one non-citizen parent and one U.S. citizen parent would be a U.S. citizen at birth even if born abroad if the U.S. citizen parent had lived 10 years in the U.S., 5 of which were after the age of *14*; Obama’s mother was only 18 when Obama was born, so he would not have been a U.S. citizen at birth had he been born outside of the U.S.

The law was subsequently amended, in 1982 IIRC, and now a child born abroad with one alien parent and one citizen parent is a citizen at birth if the citizen parent lived in the U.S. for at least 5 years, of which at least 2 were after the age of 14. But Obama was born in 1961, not the 1980s, and thus it is the law in effect in 1961 that applied to his citizenship status at birth.

But if Obama was born in Hawaii as he claims (and as the photographed Certificate of Life Birth says), then he was a U.S. citizen at birth and thus a natural-born citizen eligible for the presidency.


76 posted on 08/23/2008 10:04:23 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (Fred Thompson appears human-sized because he is actually standing a million miles away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson