Exactly what I was thinking. I wrote while he was in Hawaii that it would cost him some payola. But the fix appears to be in, probably not much we can do about it.
Of course, if Polarik got a look at the original evidence and could compare it to the scanned in version, I’m willing to bet the two documents wouldn’t be a match. That’s why we don’t see a scanned in version of the document the factcheck guys are holding.
Well, I don’t know what to do from here. It is something beyond our capabilities unless that lawsuit bears some fruit. The fact remains that what is up on the fightthesmears website is a most likely a forgery.
Try an "etched in stone" forgery.
Tomorrow, I'm blowing the lid off this latest subterfuge.
I'm taking no prisoners.
I'm still rankled by being in the same group as the now-discredited TechDude who had the audacity to suggest the forger used solvent to wash the laser ink off the paper.
Oh, they got in a little zinger to me, personally, by dragging out that thoroughly disputed claim of "scanner artifacts."
"Scaner artifact" my lily white arse.
I've already sent them two emails calling them out, but they won't come out, that's for sure.
So, it would be real sweet if I could get the message out to the blogsphere that Polarik is still here and has never been proven wrong.
Memo to FactCheck: "Is that all you got, chump?"