He's looking ahead.
1 posted on
08/20/2008 5:16:13 PM PDT by
decimon
To: decimon
Why doesn’t he just do away with them? Or would that be above his pay grade, too?
2 posted on
08/20/2008 5:19:11 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
(Without the second, the rest are just politicians' BS.)
To: decimon
Eliminate the competition!
He’s learned well from Herr Schickelgruber and Comrade Stalin.
3 posted on
08/20/2008 5:19:24 PM PDT by
hotshu
(My eye hurts dammit!)
To: decimon
Arty Johnson picture.........
very interesting!
4 posted on
08/20/2008 5:19:43 PM PDT by
LasVegasMac
(Islam: Bringing the world death and destruction for 1400 years!)
To: decimon
2012 might be too late! They might do him in now.
5 posted on
08/20/2008 5:21:35 PM PDT by
ryan71
To: decimon
What? He wants to do away with all the things that have him in line for the nomination? I’m surprised he doesn’t want to go to an all caucus nominating procedure
7 posted on
08/20/2008 5:25:48 PM PDT by
Figment
("A communist is someone who reads Marx.An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx" R Reagan)
To: decimon
I thought I heard in a news report today that Stephanie Tubbs Jones who was hospitalized today, was to head up a committee about changes to superdelegates in future elections to be held on Sept 4.
9 posted on
08/20/2008 5:37:01 PM PDT by
okokie
To: decimon
Look for the end of the electoral college before the 2012 elections also. BIG city will be in charge of selecting who runs this country from now on.
11 posted on
08/20/2008 5:42:47 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(A History and Science Minute.- "Climate change" has been going on for millions of years!)
To: decimon
He's looking ahead.
That's like hoping for 'ball four' after you have already taken strike three. Here comes ...'Hillary'!
14 posted on
08/20/2008 5:46:19 PM PDT by
Don Corleone
(Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
To: decimon
Barack Obama's campaign will call next weekCall for, hell. He should be directing such activities. He is their nominee. He should be dictating policy, not suggesting ideas.
15 posted on
08/20/2008 5:49:00 PM PDT by
krb
(If you're not outraged, people probably like having you around.)
To: decimon
What IS it with the dems and their popularity-contest caucuses, superdelegates who can override the real voters, and split-the-delegates-according-to-who-got-what-percentage system? Why don't they just have a primary like the grown-ups do: the voters go to the polls and cast their secret ballots, and the winner of each state takes all of that state's marbles.
No superdelegates, no funny-business, high-pressure caucuses, and none of this "there are no winners or losers" BS about the state's delegates.
16 posted on
08/20/2008 5:51:02 PM PDT by
hsalaw
To: decimon
18 posted on
08/20/2008 5:59:38 PM PDT by
Son House
( [ ]Obama=>LoseBothWars/Raise Taxes [X]McCain=>WinBothWars/CutPorkBarrelSpending)
To: decimon
“revise the rules”
Hehehehe. Barry are you getting a little nervous since you opened the door for the Clintons?
To: decimon
He need not worry about 2012. Once he loses in ‘08, he will not be the Dem nominee in 2012.
21 posted on
08/20/2008 9:44:11 PM PDT by
no dems
("Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice...." Barry Goldwater)
To: decimon
Obama Looking to Diminish Superdelegates (In 2012) Here I'll correct it.
Obama Looking to Diminish Liquidate Superdelegates (In 2012)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
