Well:
Romney - would negate the flip-flopper argument/campaign opportunity. Romney is a “Pro-Abortion unless it is politically expedient to be Pro-Life” politician. He has reversed his support of Socialized medicine only after the problems came to light and he was running for the nomination. He does come across at likable, but that just isn’t enough to convince me.
Jindal - I could like him. Maybe a bit too friendly with Pat Buchannon, but seems pretty strong on most conservative issues.
Palin - the only issue I see are those who may be against a woman in the office. She is intelligent, apparently quite conservative, and young - all things that I think would make McCain more paletable.
Graham is just plain bad. He has no backbone, is weak in many areas of policy, and is pretty much worthless.
Lieberman wold possibly help out a little in a small demographic, but overall is a very bad choice (pro-abortion, pro socialist, etc.). A poison pill in my book.
Santorum - Did you mean “Rick” not “Ron”? Santorum is pretty conservative and very pro-family.
Nichols-?
Bolton - which one?
Zell - too old, but could be fun!
Thanks for the correction. Rick Santorom. I had to write fast as I am at work. You know, the bolton that was in the UN. Don Nichols (OKLA) retired conservative. I’ll throw in Sonny Perdue, Tancredo, Duncan Hunter, Phil Graham