Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Astronomers Find Unusual New Denizen Of The Solar System
Science Daily ^ | August 19th, 2008

Posted on 08/19/2008 10:57:10 AM PDT by Raineygoodyear

A "minor planet" with the prosaic name 2006 SQ372 is just over two billion miles from Earth, a bit closer than the planet Neptune. But this lump of ice and rock is beginning the return leg of a 22,500-year journey that will take it to a distance of 150 billion miles, nearly 1,600 times the distance from the Earth to the Sun, according to a team of researchers from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-II). The discovery of this remarkable object was reported today in Chicago, at an international symposium titled "The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Asteroids to Cosmology." A paper describing the discovery technique and the properties of 2006 SQ372 is being prepared for submission ADDITION: Percival Lowell- Born March 13, 1855 Died November 12, 1916 Fields astronomy Lowell's greatest contribution to planetary studies came during the last decade of his life, which he devoted to the search for Planet X, a hypothetical planet beyond Neptune. Lowell believed that the planets Uranus and Neptune were displaced from their predicted positions by the gravity of the unseen Planet X. Although Lowell's searches from 1905 to 1916 proved unsuccessful, the search continued after his death at Flagstaff in 1916.

(Excerpt) Read more at sciencedaily.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: alarmism; bushsfault; catastrophism; gloomanddoom; hillarysass; moonbat; omgwearegoingtodie; sighwhatever; theskyisfalling; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 08/19/2008 10:57:12 AM PDT by Raineygoodyear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Isn’t this info fall in line with all the 2012 Predictions?

Planet X: This was the name given by astronomer Percival Lowell to a planet that he believed existed beyond the orbit of Neptune. Although his calculations were off, and the discovery of Pluto accounted for his observations, some astronomers have suggested that a new Planet X

Most of the stars in our galaxy are binaries. They suggest that interaction between our sun and the brown dwarf may be increasing the temperature of the sun, generating global warming on Earth, and will cause an increase in the severity of the next peak in the 11 year sunspot cycle in the year 2011-2012. These influences may destroy the Earth’s magnetic field, and induce what Emmanuel Velikovsky called a ELE: an Extinction Level Event


2 posted on 08/19/2008 11:02:29 AM PDT by Raineygoodyear (AKA Crimmy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raineygoodyear

Ask me in 2013.


3 posted on 08/19/2008 11:15:29 AM PDT by wireman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Raineygoodyear

This is a big lump of ice?

Maybe name it planet ***HILLARY***


4 posted on 08/19/2008 11:17:56 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Raineygoodyear
I saw this mysterious Planet X in 1951!!!


5 posted on 08/19/2008 11:22:17 AM PDT by Young Werther (Julius Caesar (Quae Cum Ita Sunt. Since these things are so.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raineygoodyear

Well. We lost Pluto two years ago. One down, eight to go. Astrology went down the drain completely.
What are we coming to, for heaven’s sake?

On the other hand, the universe is very large. Perhaps the largest thing there is.


6 posted on 08/19/2008 11:29:47 AM PDT by Apollo 13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quick; SunkenCiv

Thought you might be interested in this.


7 posted on 08/19/2008 11:35:22 AM PDT by dragonblustar (Once abolish the God, and the government becomes the God - G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raineygoodyear

Interesting.


8 posted on 08/19/2008 11:37:21 AM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Obama for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Apollo 13

Question #1. Briefly, and in your own words, describe the universe.

Question #1a. Give three examples.


9 posted on 08/19/2008 12:04:44 PM PDT by Hegemony Cricket (Vigilantism will arise where the justice system is viewed as overly lenient and/or ineffective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Raineygoodyear
The only thing significant about 2012 is that a lot of 2012 end of the world books will stop selling by the end of the year.
10 posted on 08/19/2008 12:09:49 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hegemony Cricket

Hmmm Sir -

1. The universe is by definition everything that there is. And we earthlings are inhabitants of that same universe, we are ‘involutions’ into that same universe. That is a strange thought. We may pass away eventually, but since we are matter which is nothing else but an extension in space, or condensed energy if you will, that which constitutes us won’t ever disappear. That is another stange thought. I could calculate how much energy one human being represents, but that would lead to a frightening number of Joules. Mind-boggling, in fact.
Now: I pondered: what is consciousness? It is not possible to locate it in a single bodily spot. Descartes tried it but failed (he placed it in the pineal gland). Modern computer scientists, who call themselves eliminative materialists, will also fail, however pompous they behave themselves at the moment. Since we humans are not closed systems but open to the universe, we might say: the conciousness of each of us is equal to the universe itself. That is not ridiculous. Whenever I look up at the sky, I can look at stars that are millions of light years away. Yet their light catches my eyes, and thereby affects my perception, however tiny that effect may be. So my consciousness is like a net that can be thrown over everything that there is. A strange position to take, since I also conjecture that my consciousness has no extension in space and is thereby immaterial and without mass. Because had it an extension in space, I could by definition locate it.

1a. Do I pretend to be God by the answer above? Of course not. I cannot know Him by definition, nor do I have the powers ascribed to God, or the knowledge.

1b. I only know that I am a material involution into the universe as described above, an involution that at some time in the future can be said to change its form and lose what it takes to be its own consciousness.

1c. When event 1b. will have taken place, I can surmise two things: I will leave some sort of ‘footprint’ behind me, the form of which I cannot know (most likely a changed shape of the matter that constitutes me now, and a shape that will be without what we call consciousness).
The other assumption that is safe is that the consciousness of those that will survive me will be active and perceiving and shaping the world after I am gone.

I am afraid, Sir, that this is all I have to say on the matter for the moment.


11 posted on 08/19/2008 12:26:07 PM PDT by Apollo 13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Apollo 13

Hehehe - the questions were actually tongue-in-cheek, however, you gave some interesting answers, particularly on the subject of consciousness. What would be your conjecture concerning what happens to an individual’s consciousness when it is separated from their material being?


12 posted on 08/19/2008 1:08:34 PM PDT by Hegemony Cricket (Vigilantism will arise where the justice system is viewed as overly lenient and/or ineffective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hegemony Cricket

Thank you for the kind reply, HC -

in fact you raised the $M question here. The intriguing thing is: if I take consciousness to be not extended in space, then in theory it is possible that it survives me in full after I am dead. I wrote something to the extent that it wouldn’t be there anymore then, but this is imprecise writing.
Most natural philophers past and present agree that in deep sleep we are unconscious, same in fact when we are anaesthesized in hospital. Yet we regain consciousness in full after those states.

This is most interesting. Because it would mean that people with Alzheimer, who seem to be losing parts of consciousness by and by, theoretically can be said to not have their consciousness destroyed ever more, but that more of it gets to be ‘dormant’ for an unknown time.

By extension this could go for deceased people as well.

I am flabbergasted, Sir, what your tongue-in-cheek questions (and I know that they were meant that way!) have brought about in two simple sessions.

The only axiom in the whole story is that consciousness is not extended in space (i.e. knows no mass).

I will pursue the matter further.

(Cheers matey!)


13 posted on 08/20/2008 1:42:47 AM PDT by Apollo 13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Apollo 13

Good follow up discussion - I like your style, A13! I think you are exactly right about the weight of that question, and I believe it is one that many people have wrestled with for thousands of years.

In particular, I appreciated your comment about Alzheimer’s. As I watched my grandmother progress through the stages, sometimes she would think I was me, sometimes I was my grandfather, sometimes my father, sometimes my uncle. It was like reverse schizophrenia. Always in her eyes was the spark of intelligence, just not always recognition. Once I listened to her vivid and animated description of riding horses across the prairie in about 1915, but then she couldn’t recall having eaten lunch 15 minutes earlier.

Anyway, now the question is really raised to the next level. If there is consciousness (which there obviously is), and if it is not extended into space (has no mass), then we can assume that things (for lack of a better word) exist outside of the material realm. So what are those things, of what do they consist, and what is their existence like?


14 posted on 08/20/2008 6:59:26 AM PDT by Hegemony Cricket (Vigilantism will arise where the justice system is viewed as overly lenient and/or ineffective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hegemony Cricket
Thanks for a most moving post, HC - I am deeply moved about your anecdote on your grandmother. Let me first say that I am quite wary of popular beliefs in reincarnation, or in the divine white light that people with near-death experiences report about - although I have nothing but the utmost respect for the motives that drive these beliefs. For the first we have no real evidence, and the second could potentially be caused by a common 'shutdown' mechanism in our brains just prior to death, e.g. one that affects our visual system (as a scientist I am skeptical in these matters; but I am certainly not a nihilist, neither a materialist). But you hit it on the head: assuming that consciousness has no spatial extension and no mass, then I am led to the conclusion that it can in principle very well exist when my material body has decomposed. As I wrote, it's accepted as so normal by philosophers and scientists alike that we regain consciousness after deep sleep that the sheer wonder of this is overlooked. One cannot regain something one has not lost, after all. And I refuse to accept that it simply ceased to exist at all when falling asleep and popped into being again when waking up. Now: I think it would be acceptable to surmise that 'I' did not exist as 'me' before my own conception. I am the product, if you will, of the love of my parents, and my consciousness is the product of both of them too in a way that is too mysterious to grasp for me. I think it is also acceptable to conjecture that 'I' will not 'disintegrate' back into my two parents again after my body has stopped to operate. For the moment I can only say that my (our) line of reasoning leads to the preliminary conclusion that it is in theory possible that our consciousness remains after our death; and this then would be valid for everyone. I am afraid that I would claim to be God if I would pretend to know what happens with the souls (I think it is perfectly admissible to name them thus). And I wouldn't have a clue either in what the soul of a deceased infant would be like compared to the soul of an elderly person who passed away. (tbc)
15 posted on 08/20/2008 8:07:45 AM PDT by Apollo 13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hegemony Cricket

Hi, in my former post I tried to make paragraphs, but after much fiddling it still did not work, don’t know why.

Better next time.


16 posted on 08/20/2008 8:09:40 AM PDT by Apollo 13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Apollo 13

Good stuff, there. Thanks for the sentiment about my grandmother.

Formatting-wise: I keep this thread bookmarked - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1823580/posts - it has helped me a lot.


17 posted on 08/20/2008 10:29:22 AM PDT by Hegemony Cricket (Vigilantism will arise where the justice system is viewed as overly lenient and/or ineffective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hegemony Cricket

Thanks! That’ll help a lot.


18 posted on 08/20/2008 10:47:52 AM PDT by Apollo 13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar

Thanks!

Astronomers Find a New “Minor Planet” near Neptune
Universe Today | 8/18/08 | Nancy Atkinson
Posted on 08/18/2008 12:16:43 PM PDT by LibWhacker
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2063873/posts


19 posted on 08/21/2008 11:58:26 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

 
X-Planets
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·

20 posted on 08/21/2008 11:58:58 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson