Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom
So what's the problem with adjusting science to fit the Bible again?

Uh, you have been reading too much from creationwiki.com. They did NOT adjust science to fit the Bible but to fit the evidence presented. Much like the scientists adjusted from the sun revolving around the earth to the earth revolving around the sun to fit the new evidence.

968 posted on 08/22/2008 9:14:28 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 965 | View Replies ]


To: ColdWater
They did NOT adjust science to fit the Bible but to fit the evidence presented.

And that was their problem because the Bible was right. But in their arrogance they thought they knew better than God. No wonder they keep trying to get rid of Him. Their ego can't stand the competition.

976 posted on 08/22/2008 9:19:47 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 968 | View Replies ]

To: ColdWater
Uh, you have been reading too much from creationwiki.com. They did NOT adjust science to fit the Bible but to fit the evidence presented. Much like the scientists adjusted from the sun revolving around the earth to the earth revolving around the sun to fit the new evidence.

Here is another good one.

Check out the Institute for Creation Research website! (excerpts below).

They are doing pure apologetics, not science.


Tenets of Scientific Creationism


984 posted on 08/22/2008 9:30:47 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 968 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson