[ColdWater]

"There is a difference between Intelligent Design, which is the name of a movement, and the concept of intelligent design. Most ID research can be fit into Creation Science, but Creation Science cannot be fit into the ID movement because it's scope of scientific inquiry is too small."

So tell me, now that you have read the above, does the Pope’s endorsement of ID mean he is “stupid”?

The pope endorses the ID movement which specifically states that the ID'er may not be God and their chief witness stated that the ID'er may be dead since we have seen no evidence of his creation in the last few hundred million years of evolution?

[GodGunsGuts]

==The pope endorses the ID movement which specifically states that the ID’er may not be God and their chief witness stated that the ID’er may be dead since we have seen no evidence of his creation in the last few hundred million years of evolution?

I’m not saying the Pope considers himself a member of the ID movement, I’m saying he endorses the concept of ID generally, and that he believes the ID’er is the God of the Bible.

PS I am not an ID’er. I am YEC. ID only goes as far as what nature tells us about the designer. YECers rely on the historical record recounted by God in the Bible to help guide their research. Which makes YEC research project far superior to either Darwin’s ToE or ID.