==Is there any evidence they haven’t been allowed to present?
Haven’t you been paying attention? The Temple of Darwin teamed up with the Communist ACLU to prevent students from learning about both sides of the scientific debate.
Within science there are not two sides to this issue, nor is there a debate.
The "debate" is creationists attacking science in an attempt to get their particular brand of superstition taught in place of science--and having the nerve to call it science! What a joke!
The ironic thing (well, I guess we should have expected deceit from those on the “other” side) is that the argument that the ACLU first put forth was about
“presenting a balanced view”.
Once they got their foot in the door, they again went to the coercive body of government in order to kick the other viewpoint out.
How many other scientists have been denied the opportunity to present their evidence? Those students have a finite amount of class time to devote to science.
There must be thousands of scientists who are being denied the opportunity to "present their evidence".
It’s always something with the godless...
1. “but but but it’s not science”.
then you prove no one can conclusively agree on the very definition of science, let alone what’s accepted by all scientists AS science.
then
2. “there’s no proof”
then you provide proof but that’s not proof, so say the godless...
3. “there’s no scientific paper”
aggain, so say the godless...
and so on ...
ad infinatum.