It would be very difficult to remove “darwinian assumptions”, because removing the assumptions causes the whole circular theory to collapse.
Evolution, in the macro sense (I throw that in there just to pss the evos off), is an extravagent extrapolation based on forcing a model on the evidence, and extrapolating based on current observations of “natural selection” and breeding.
Current observations support natural selection by causing EXISTING INFORMATION in the organisms’ makeup to be expressed.
Current observations do NOT support the extrapolation that one kind of organism can “evolve” into another.
==It would be very difficult to remove “darwinian assumptions”, because removing the assumptions causes the whole circular theory to collapse.
That’s my point. Either you remove Darwinist assumptions, or you allow those assumptions to be challenged by Creation/ID scientists in every case. Either way, Darwin’s ToE gets exposed for the unscientific fairytale it is.