Replies

You wrote:

“1. Buc complained that child support is essentially whatever women want to spend it on....due to his experience. Not only is that another of many slams he’s made against women in this thread, he’s hardly a victim here.”

1. But who are you to judge that he isn’t a victim? He said his wife cheated on him. She wanted the divorce. He didn’t. Now he has no say in his child’s life and he has to pay support OUTSIDE his household and he has no say in how it is spent. How is he NOT a victim here?

Tell me, seriously, if your husband cheated on you, divorced you against your will, and got complete custody of the kids and child support, would you feel like a victim? I bet you would. Who wouldn’t?

2) I don’t think Buc is complaining about women across the board, but he is complaining about bias towards women in our legal system. And he has a point. Women are favored in custody battles. Everyone knows this. Everyone. Also, his original point is absolutely sound: why should a 15 year old boy be paying any money to the woman who - according to the law - raped him?

“If he wants a say in how someone else runs their household, then he needs to find a way to be a part of it otherwise it’s none of his business.”

It’s his child too. He didn’t want the divorce. She did. You keep ignoring that fact. How can he “find a way to be a part of it” when his wife refused to allow him to do so? Remember, she wanted the divorce. He didn’t.

“2.Buc made several comments against women in this thread and like it or not, women are a part of this forum.”

Women are part of this forum. So is Buc. You made several completely unfair and unwarranted comments against Buc - attacking him personally - while he had not addressed any toward you until you attacked him. Why bother doing that? What good is going to be accomplished with that approach? Also, Buc certainly did not make any anti-women comments before you post in #36. If he did after that I didn’t see it.

“Poor arguments combined with inane generalizations about groups of people probably won’t bring you any peace. LOL”

Perhaps not, but attacking a man as if he was at fault when you know NOTHING first hand about the situation will be better? How so?

“3.If Buc isn’t able to handle the consequences of his poorly thought through opinions, then maybe someone could lend him a clue.”

Are you sure you have a clue to lend? 1) You clearly know nothing about Buc’s case so how can you act so presumptively about it? 2) You seem completely unfamiliar with the basic facts of how most custody cases go in court. 3) You seem completely unfamiliar with the fact that our family court system is dominated by left wing inspired feminist appraisals of men that severely limit the parental rights of fathers. 4) You apparently can’t even see how you’re acting. 5) Honey works better than what you’re shelling out doesn’t it? Don’t you think you would be more successful in getting your point across if you treated him like a decent person rather than mocking him as if his failed marriage was his fault (when you have no CLUE what happened!)?

I’m just saying...