The U.S. Constitution says nothing about such certificates as none were available when the Constitution was ratified.
There is plenty of evidence Obama's mother lived in Hawaii when the boy was born.
This birth certificate controversy is a load of crap and distracts from the dangerous beliefs of this man which are the REAL problem with electing him.
If his birth certificate is a non issue why doesn’t Obama just release his real birth certificate?
You need to check the law about her. It states 5 years of residency AFTER the age of 18. She was only 21. Therein lies the problem. The cert could have been made out with his fathers nationality.
What I really disagree with is your logic and your conclusion. The constitution lays out the qualifications. It doesn't address computers, each county's records, etc. Therefore the method of verification of these qualifications changes over time and with advancing technology and legal requirements.
If OB or anyone else doesn't meet the qualifications they should be out. Even if it is discovered when they are in office. If you're not qualified, you're out, whenever.
So let's air the proof and move on (not . org).
The Constitution is specific about the residency requirements of a childs parents that estabilsh eligibility for citizenship.
Perhaps when the Constitution was written there were not specific birth records available, but the process of birth records rapidly evolved and was established by the US Census very early in the start of Our Republic. The ability to keep track of citizens was established because our founding fathers deemed it vital to establish birth records
“”The U.S. Constitution says nothing about such certificates as none were available when the Constitution was ratified””
That makes your assumption invalid.
I agree with you that Obama’s beliefs are dangerous. But it is also dangerous to trust without verification. Allowing a non citizen to become President sets the precident for other abuses. Just like the collection of income taxes, which was never ratified as a constitutional Amendment as required, but taxes have been collected and the precident was set for legal basis.
Every time we turn around, some court is finding some aspect of life “unconstitutional” The left would like nothing more than to manipulate the Constitution of the US to help them control and regulate free people.
This is the whole basis of everything that Corsi so staunchly exposes and stands against.
First it is not crap. It's also serious stuff. At the very least, we have "fraudulent misrepresentation of one's true identity," and "the commission of perfidy, by the man who would be President.
We'll let you contact the MSM about Obama's "REAL" problem (as if lying to the electorate and defrauding them is not a "REAL" crime) and leave us to take care of this forgery issue.
If when the mainstream begins reporting and debating a story that basically telegraphs that “Barrack is not who he has been advertising himself to be”, the average voter (not already brainwashed) begins to have very serious doubts about the individual in question.
It is more valid than his dangerous belifs, maybe will disqualify him completely