Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi OKs drilling vote, but at a price
Politico ^ | August 16, 2008 | Patrick O'Connor

Posted on 08/16/2008 8:48:04 AM PDT by Delacon

 

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) will grant the Republicans' their big wish this campaign season — a vote on offshore oil and gas drilling — but only if the GOP accepts a few of her own demands.

Pelosi's decision to relent on the drilling issue, laid out with new clarity in Saturday’s Democratic radio address, illustrates the political pressure Democrats are feeling this campaign season. But the legislative menu Pelosi envisions includes a number of offerings that Republicans have considered unpalatable, a clear indication she will force the GOP to give up a lot in exchange for more domestic oil and gas exploration.

Her priorities include a repeal of royalty relief for offshore drillers and an end to other tax credits for the biggest oil companies, as well as so-called use it or lose it legislation forcing energy companies to relinquish un-used leases.

In the radio address, Pelosi said the Democrats' plan "will consider opening portions of the Outer Continental Shelf for drilling, with appropriate safeguards, and without taxpayer subsidies for Big Oil."
As excerpts from Pelosi's address spread among lawmakers and their staffs Friday night, House Republican Conference spokesman Brian Schubert was encouraging GOP press secretaries and communications directors to “have your bosses issue statements pointing out that Speaker Pelosi’s energy plan is not an all-of-the-above answer to our energy crisis, nor will it take all of the necessary steps — overwhelmingly supported by the American people.”

And before Pelosi’s address even aired, House Republican had posted a “fact-checking” article on the House Republican Conference website.

Most of the items Pelosi outlined on Saturday have been considered in the past two years: requiring President Bush to release oil from the 700-million-barrel Strategic Petroleum Reserve, creating new safeguards to prevent "excessive speculation" in the commodities markets, forcing energy companies to use more renewable technologies and reducing mass transit costs for commuters.

Many of the items on her legislative wish list failed earlier this summer because Democrats brought the measures to the floor under rules reserved for noncontroversial legislation. Those rules block the minority from offering alternatives but also require a higher threshold for passage.

"Suspension of the rules is not the way to consider energy issues," said California Rep. David Dreier, the ranking Republican on the House Rules Committee.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, in a conference call on Friday, didn't shoot down Pelosi's plan to move a measure that includes more drilling. Instead, he applauded the bipartisan "Gang of 10" for offering a compromise package in the Senate that would allow Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia to opt out of a federal ban on offshore oil and gas drilling, calling it a "step in the right direction."

The Nevada Democrat, who has organized an energy summit in Las Vegas next week, repeatedly suggested that any package should include an extension of tax credits to boost investment in renewable sources of energy — a priority Reid and Pelosi share that remains stuck in the Senate. "Let's get these long-term tax credits in place," Reid said.

A spokesman for the Senate majority leader said the extended tax breaks, which have come within one vote of being considered, are not mutually exclusive with Pelosi's broader package.

"The ball is in the Republicans' court," Reid spokesman Jim Manley said. "They've blocked every attempt to move responsible incentives for renewable energy. The question now is whether cooler heads have prevailed."

Josh Holmes, a spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), said, “It’s amazing that after months of congressional debate about high gas prices Democrats are still more committed to blaming others for their inaction than they are actually doing something to reduce the price of gas."

Pelosi’s proposal comes as House Republicans finished the second full week of protests on the House floor. Indiana Rep. Mike Pence, one of the original ringleaders of the protest, said Republicans would continue to hold the floor until Pelosi brings the House back into session.

Although Pelosi laid out the circumstances Saturday under which she might allow a vote on offshore drilling, she repeatedly derided GOP calls for it.

"America faces a choice: a continuation of the Bush-Cheney-McCain approach that perpetuates the failed policies that have produced soaring prices," Pelosi said, "or a comprehensive, bipartisan strategy that develops new and traditional sources of energy."

Her counterpart, Republican Leader John A. Boehner of Ohio, shot back: "While the speaker now claims to embrace a comprehensive energy plan that includes more conservation, more innovation, and more American energy production, the Democrats’ utter inaction on this issue trumps their newfound, hollow support for the very reforms Republicans have been promoting all year long."

Earlier this week, McConnell flatly rejected any drilling measure that includes countervailing provisions that would raise taxes — an indirect slight to the "Gang of 10" plan and a preemptive shot across the bow at measures such as the proposed repeal of billions of dollars in tax credits for big oil companies.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 110th; congress; democrats; drilling; energy; gangof10; oil; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Delacon

She’s lying. If the Dems maintain their voting position in Congress after November, any talk about drilling never happened. And they’ll just keep up that story until it disappears.


21 posted on 08/16/2008 9:57:10 AM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Pelosi will phrase it any way that she wants...but she’s still caving...and her girlie whine about oil drilling being a “hoax” or that she was “saving our planet” just got put paid.


22 posted on 08/16/2008 9:59:30 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

BULL give up nothing.. force Nancy to give in on oil drilling or make it a presidential issue.. It already IS a presidential issue.. Thats WHY she wants to “deal”.. I say TOTAL surrender on energy policy.. TOTAL.. ELSE ride it into January..


23 posted on 08/16/2008 10:08:12 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

San Fran Nan needs to go home. It’s getting dark and the street lights are on.


24 posted on 08/16/2008 10:14:09 AM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Everything connected to No-No-Nancy comes at a price.
For the USA, the price is rapidly becoming tooooo high.


25 posted on 08/16/2008 10:32:52 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LtKerst

Nancy Pelosi is a Trecherous Gorgon Hag.

It will take a gallon of lysol to clean off that Gavel when She is gone”

Discard the gavel in a toxic bag. But a new one.


26 posted on 08/16/2008 10:34:10 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Delacon; gusopol3; NormsRevenge; thackney; BOBTHENAILER; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; blam; ...

Thanks for posting this ...I detest Pelosi.


27 posted on 08/16/2008 12:06:11 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
One would think that the national security implications of being dependent on hostile countries for oil would sink in with recent events. The Sominex Effect of the MSM is tough to buck I guess.

What is the cost of the Democrat "No Domestic Energy Policy?"

All of that puts the U.S. in a position that war for oil or
complete economic collapse will be our only choices.
You can't frustrate every source of domestic energy
without consequences. Our enemies will blackmail us
to the extent that we are vulnerable to blackmail.

The Democrats are leading us into a real war for oil.
A war we won't have the energy to fight.

28 posted on 08/16/2008 12:56:02 PM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin '36 ... Olympics for murdering regimes. ... Beijing '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

So i guess she doesn’t want to save the planet anymore?


29 posted on 08/16/2008 3:17:17 PM PDT by Unicorn (Too many wimps around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles; Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Nancy Pelosi is a Trecherous Gorgon Hag."
From day one of her reign, I had attributed her more as a sea hag spy, but I'll accept your description without hesitation.
30 posted on 08/16/2008 4:57:17 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Duncan Hunter was our best choice...Now we are left with a bunch of idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson