8mm
Posted on 08/15/2008 2:43:50 PM PDT by wagglebee
LifeNews.com Note: Austin Ruse is president of the New York and Washington DC-based Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute. These views are his alone and do not reflect the position of C-FAM. Ruse is also a member of the McCain Catholic Steering Committee and one of the first pro-life advocates to endorse McCain.
If John McCain picks a pro-abortion running mate, he's likely to lose. If he picks a pro-abortion Catholic as his running mate, he will definitely lose.
Right now McCain is skating on the thinnest of ice. At best, the election is tied. In many polls, he is 4-5 points down. He has yet to crack 45 percent in any national poll and is behind in key states. At worst, he is facing a blowout. Now is not the time to mess around with a guy like Tom Ridge.
The calculation is clear.
McCain figures Ridge could deliver the key state of Pennsylvania. Let's look at the record.
Ridge won statewide office in 1994 with only 45 percent of the vote. Why so low? Because he faced a third party pro-life challenger named Peg Lustig who polled a whopping 12 percent of the vote. Ridge ran again in 1998 and won with the much greater margin of 57 percent, but he did so against a very weak Democratic opponent and he forfeited 10 percent to pro-life Lustig, who ran again.
That Ridge, now, ten years later, could help McCain win Pennsylvania is far from certain. And then there is what McCain loses elsewhere for picking Ridge.
McCain is already suspect among social conservatives. And picking a pro-choicer will have the further effect of cooling whatever ardor he has been able to gin up among them mostly because of the fear of Obama. Social conservatives are largely not for McCain, they are against Obama. A lack of enthusiasm among McCain supporters could spell disaster for him come Election Day.
There is already a major effort underway to lure pro-lifers into the Democratic column.
The Democratic platform makes nice noises about motherhood and adoption. And evangelicals are getting restless to get involved in other issues. The McCain camp should not give them yet one more reason to drift.
And then there is the Catholic thing.
At the moment, McCain can expect at least tepid support among faithful Catholics, those who go to Mass at least once a week and who support the teachings of the Church on core issues like abortion. He needs this group to win the election.
He is putting them in an untenable position if he decides to pick Ridge - or any pro-choicer, but especially a pro-choice Catholic.
Tom Ridge is a public dissenter from one of the core teachings of the Catholic Church, that innocent human life must always be protected and may never be deliberately taken. McCain is asking faithful Catholics to pull the lever for someone whose position on abortion makes them sick to their stomachs.
A prediction: if McCain goes ahead with Ridge, it will lead to a public spectacle.
Wasn't McCain paying attention four years ago when another publicly dissenting Catholic ran for president? John Kerry lost the generic Catholic vote, that is, any person who claims to be a Catholic, whether he or she has not been to Mass in thirty years or even marginally agrees with the teachings of the Church.
This is an easy get for the Democrats, yet Kerry lost them. With the exception of his home state of Massachusetts, he even lost them in the states he won.
Kerry and Communion became a staple of the public debate. For the first time ever, the Eucharist was front and center in a national political campaign. There is no doubt this would happen again, perhaps this time with even greater controversy.
McCain would face the dead certainty that his vice-presidential running mate could not speak in front of official Catholic audiences or at Catholic institutions because this is forbidden by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.
In 1998, Ridge was told by his hometown bishop, Donald Trautman of the Diocese of Erie, that he could not speak on church property. In this year's presidential race, Ridge would be told by bishops around the country not to present himself for Communion.
This would become a recurrent nightmare for the McCain campaign week after week after week. Is that a winning message for McCain?
Finally, McCain is asking Republicans to accept a man who, if he wins, would likely be the presumptive presidential nominee sometime in the future.
This would effectively turn the Republicans away from being the pro-life party and would spell electoral disaster for Republicans for years to come. Pro-lifers certainly would have a very hard time voting for a pro-choicer at the top of the national ticket. Look at what happened to Rudy Giuliani in the primaries.
And they certainly would never support a publicly dissenting Catholic. The way of Ridge is the way of both defeat and disaster.
“So, at what point does McCain actually start earning our votes?”
He doesn’t. He clearly believes that he doesn’t need to earn conservative votes. And I think he’s probably right. Most “conservatives” will vote for anyone so long as they have a Republican label behind their name.
“I’m afraid of an Obama presidency.”
And that shows just how successful the perpetual strategy of the GOP is. It doesn’t change from election to election. Vote for our candidate because _____ is so horrible!
Yes, Sen. Obama would be a rotten President. But Sen. McCain wouldn’t be all that much better in reality.
“I’m going to stop describing myself as “pro-life” and start describing myself as pro-creation. My descendants and the myriad of other pro-creators will finally outnumber the reprobate evil doers and we will overthrow the murderous child-sacrificing regime of abortion.”
Wow. I’ve been arguing for some time that infanticide will eventually become illegal in the U.S. About 2 months after the last clinic closes due to lack of business.
Children tend to take on the attitudes and perspectives of their parents. Pro-creation parents spawn pro-creation children. Anti-life parents would spawn anti-life children, but the horrible reality is they’re aborting and contracepting their would-be children out of existence.
Fast forward a generation or two where the pro-creation folks have been fruitful and multiplied, and the anti-life folks have perhaps allowed one trophy baby to live here and there and you can see where this all changes. Not because of any great moral conversion, but because of math.
“Baloney. If they go to a Catholic church and vote for Kennedy or Clinton they are still Catholics. Just because YOU don’t call them that doesn’t mean they don’t”
Yeah, just like walking into a garage makes me a mechanic!!
You know nothing about Catholics!!!
mrs
“Baloney. If they go to a Catholic church and vote for Kennedy or Clinton they are still Catholics. Just because YOU don’t call them that doesn’t mean they don’t”
Yeah, just like walking into a garage makes me a mechanic!!
You know nothing about Catholics!!!
______________________________________________________
Oh, okay. I went to Catholic schools for twelve years but you would know better.
I mistyped that statement. It should have read: “Baloney. If they go to a Catholic church and vote for Kennedy or Clinton they think they are still Catholics.”
No need for you to get so combative.
*****************
I'm afraid that is far from a correct assumption. Obama is an extremist. From all we have learned through his associations with Wright, Rezko, Ayers, Khalidi, and Pfleger, it is clear that Obama makes McCain look like a conservative.
The most important selection a President could make is not the Supreme Court, it is the Vice President.
As for trying to get Catholic support - who are the strong pro-life Catholics on McCain’s veep short list?
he is not going to get one extra vote from the libs and he is making it harder and harder for conservatives to vote for him.
If McCain decided to run with a person like Tom Ridge, he is showing himself to be not only morally feeble, but also an imbecile.
He must realize that Catholics and other religious conservatives are clinging to him by only the slenderest of threads already, and mostly because we Obamanate the other candidate. If he pulls a stunt like choosing a 'Bort for VP, he will lose us all, AND he will lose the election.
I hope some Republican operatves are reading this, and realize that this is no joke. Ifr McCain fumbles this one, he's political roadkill. It's as simple as that.
so then you know how I feel when people call cafeteria catholics, Catholics. NO ONE that supports abortion in any way is a real Catholic is my point
and you sir started the combat with your big Baloney
freegards
mrs
She doesn’t have a lot of name recognition, but Sarah Palin would be my first choice.
Why did you take it personally?
*******************
I hope they're reading it as well. If McCain selects a pro-choice running mate, it will be one of the biggest blunders in campaign history.
Actually, I don't. I choose not to let that kind of stuff bother me.
and you sir started the combat with your big Baloney
Yes, I did. I apologize. I could have easily disagreed with you without saying that.
God bless and have a wonderful day.
“Obama is an extremist.”
Yes. And he is perceived as such. Which will limit his effectiveness if he is elected.
The problem with the soft socialism of Sen. McCain is that while his objectives are not quite so extreme as those of his opponent, he is far more likely to achieve them if he is elected. In my view, the end result is going to be about the same regardless of which of the two is elected.
do you plan to vote?
I do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.