[Constitutions Grandchild]

Well, before we fall into a delirious euphoria, let's remember that this is the New York POST. If it were the New York TIMES, I'd faint.

[2ndDivisionVet]

It’s still a major New York City paper that lots of people read. As a matter of fact, what is their readership compared to the Grey Lady these days?

[panthermom]

Believe it or not, early this morning someone posted an article in the NY Times that basically agreed with this article. Not quite as forceful but they at least acknowledged the difference.

[ETL]

Well, before we fall into a delirious euphoria, let's remember that this is the New York POST.

So? They are usually more correct in their reporting than the big Lib papers. What is it that you suspect might not be accurate? Because all of what's in the excerpt is true, from what I've read, particularly these two below that the article pointed out...

In his first public reaction, Obama merely called on "Georgia and Russia to show restraint" - a reflexive exercise in what Sen. Joe Lieberman rightly labeled "moral neutrality."

Then Obama called for a UN Security Council resolution condemning Russia - apparently unaware that Moscow, a permanent Security Council member, can veto any such resolution.