Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom

Kid was not with them, he was a ward of the state..


39 posted on 08/15/2008 9:19:07 AM PDT by N3WBI3 (Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: N3WBI3

A ward of the state for a reason. I suspect that it had to do with the parenting.

Why they should be upset that the school didn’t enforce the dress code when they obviously couldn’t enforce their parental authority before it got to the point of the kid ending up in state care, is beyond me.

Besides, what’s a kid in that kind of mental condition that he’s under special care away from home, doing being allowed to go to school unsupervised anyway?


42 posted on 08/15/2008 9:22:25 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3
Kid was not with them, he was a ward of the state..

They need to sue the state, too.

And the group home, the school counselor, and any body else who participated in this farce.

Of course, they won't win, but they should sue anyway.

75 posted on 08/15/2008 10:45:49 AM PDT by Designer (We are SO scrood!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson