Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nan and the Big Wind Boone-doggle
Michelle Malkin online ^ | 08-13-2008 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 08/14/2008 6:16:26 AM PDT by autumnraine

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called congressional Republicans who want up-or-down drilling votes “hand maidens of the oil companies.” Let’s call Pelosi what she is: House girl of the Big Wind boondogglers.

Though she seemingly backtracked on labeling drilling a “hoax” this week, Pelosi refuses to consider GOP energy proposals that don’t include massive government subsidies for eco-fantastical alternatives that have never panned out.

Which brings us to Madame Speaker’s 2007 financial disclosure form. Schedule III lists “assets and ‘unearned income’” of between $100,001-$250,000 from Clean Energy Fuels Corp. - Public Common Stock.” Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is a natural gas provider founded by T. Boone Pickens. Yep, that T. Boone Pickens– former oilman-turned-wind power evangelist whose ads touting a national wind campaign are now as ubiquitous as Viagra promos.

Pickens and Pelosi now share the same talking points downplaying the need to drill and open up more access to American oil. Instead, the Pickens pie-in-the-sky plan campaign proposes to completely replace natural gas with wind power in power generation and theoretically free up natural gas for America’s transportation needs.

(Excerpt) Read more at michellemalkin.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 110th; boonepickens; energy; enviroprofiteering; malkin; pelosi; pelosipickens; tboonepickens; wheresnancy; windenergy; windmillnancy; windpower
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
My first post, I hope I do this right.

Nan's hand in the cookie jar.

1 posted on 08/14/2008 6:16:26 AM PDT by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

This woman is clearly incapable of thinking at even a junior-high level. What have we done to deserve such?


2 posted on 08/14/2008 6:18:02 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

I think we need to call her

NANNY RACHET


3 posted on 08/14/2008 6:18:08 AM PDT by Quix (key QUOTES POLS 1900 ON #76 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2031425/posts?page=77#77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

Wind power is good, Nan is bad.


4 posted on 08/14/2008 6:19:03 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (My son just joined the Navy!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

This will never see the light of day in the MSM.


5 posted on 08/14/2008 6:19:31 AM PDT by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

I’m Fed-Exing all of my personal “Bio-Mass” for StretchFace to burn for fuel in her palatial digs.


6 posted on 08/14/2008 6:24:46 AM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster

Wind and solar are a joke. Nan is a dirty trick on the American people.


7 posted on 08/14/2008 6:24:46 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW ("Make yourself sheep, and the wolves will eat you" Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Wind and solar are a joke. Nan is a dirty trick on the American people.

Wind is providing 6 percent of the electrical power used in Iowa and that could easily be up to 10 percent in 2 to 3 years. It is also providing tons of land lease money to farmers. That is not a joke in any way.

8 posted on 08/14/2008 6:46:33 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (My son just joined the Navy!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster
Wind is providing 6 percent of the electrical power used in Iowa and that could easily be up to 10 percent in 2 to 3 years. It is also providing tons of land lease money to farmers. That is not a joke in any way.

Take away generous, taxpayer-funded subsidies and most of the wind development dreams would disappear. I wouldn't consider wind a joke either, but it is being touted way beyond it's economic and practical value.

9 posted on 08/14/2008 6:52:41 AM PDT by meyer (...by any means necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster
6%. In 30 years of development. Sorry but wind isn't the answer.

And I just read that it takes 600 windmills to power 140,000 homes. Not wonderful.

10 posted on 08/14/2008 6:57:14 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW ("Make yourself sheep, and the wolves will eat you" Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: econjack; autumnraine
"This will never see the light of day in the MSM"

That is because it is mis-info.

It originated at the #DontGO blog written by William R, Collier, Jr AKA Republicanist. It then gets picked up by Mis-info queen Maulkin, and then gets spread to FR.

After numerous threads at FR, it becomes pseudo-fact.

11 posted on 08/14/2008 7:06:54 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

From where do you wrongly get that 30 year number?


12 posted on 08/14/2008 7:16:03 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (My son just joined the Navy!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster

Good gravy, there has been wind and solar since the early 80’s. It doesn’t work. There have been no “breakthroughs”. It takes too many windmills to power anything.


13 posted on 08/14/2008 7:18:14 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW ("Make yourself sheep, and the wolves will eat you" Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: meyer
Take away generous, taxpayer-funded subsidies and most of the wind development dreams would disappear. I wouldn't consider wind a joke either, but it is being touted way beyond it's economic and practical value.

In a very time wind will be subsidie free. Other forms of power get government assistance of various types too. Even the grocery store near my house got a million dollars in government assistance in order to build a bigger store. Regarding the way wind is being touted, yes, wind is not going to run my Harley and it should not be touted as a replacement for good ole gasoline.

Ever look into the black lung fund or the fact that if a nuke has a problem it is the government that does the clean up rather than an insurance policy?

14 posted on 08/14/2008 7:20:33 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (My son just joined the Navy!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

As I understand it, from an earlier thread, T-Bones “plan” is also based on a plot to seize vast water rights in that area.


15 posted on 08/14/2008 7:22:12 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster
Windpower Developement

Information on developments since 1975

16 posted on 08/14/2008 7:22:30 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW ("Make yourself sheep, and the wolves will eat you" Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Good gravy, there has been wind and solar since the early 80’s. It doesn’t work. There have been no “breakthroughs”. It takes too many windmills to power anything.

Your statement shows quite a bit if ignorance.

17 posted on 08/14/2008 7:23:46 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (My son just joined the Navy!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

My current work location prevents me from opening that link. But what I will say is that 1gw of wind can produce about 2500 gwhr of power which represents about 5 percent of Iowa’s use. We can add 1 GW of wind every 3 years so your 30 years number is rather meaningless.


18 posted on 08/14/2008 7:26:22 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (My son just joined the Navy!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster
Your statement shows quite a bit if ignorance.

Hardly. See post 16.

Last week, another Freeper was talking about their states wonderful wind turbines, that are run by gas when there's no wind.

19 posted on 08/14/2008 7:26:39 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW ("Make yourself sheep, and the wolves will eat you" Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster

No it’s not. You still need a forest of windmills to get any significant power. Wind will never be a mainstream, viable alternative.


20 posted on 08/14/2008 7:28:18 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW ("Make yourself sheep, and the wolves will eat you" Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson