Posted on 08/13/2008 5:03:18 PM PDT by thinkingIsPresuppositional
Huffington Post's female pundits enraged over cheating John Edwards
By David Paulin
Over at the lefty Huffington Post, John Edwards' confession of being a cheat has, interestingly, provoked fury among some of the gal pundits. They're mercilessly trashing the pretty boy populist -- spitting a toxic venom that even their like-minded male counterparts cannot match. Some, incredibly, are even digging their nails into Edwards' wife Elizabeth (who is battling cancer) for having aided and abetted her husband's public lies.
What's going on?
Could these ladies be writing with some deeper understanding of the issues at play, perhaps having suffered, like so many American women, at the hands of philandering boyfriends or spouses? According to one survey, 50 to 60 percent of married men have broken their marriage vows -- compared to 45 to 50 percent of women. Perhaps the columnists are subconsciously tapping into their outrage over the humiliation that their sister, Hillary, suffered as First Lady.
However, perhaps their outrage underscores something really profound: Yes, America may the midst of a culture war -- but marital infidelity, it seems, is definitely not an issue that any longer divides many Republican and Democratic women -- if it ever did. Indeed, none of the Edwards-hating Huffington Post lefties reveals a trace of the sophisticated “European attitude” about cheating husbands: the belief that flawed marriages with wandering men are not a big deal, even with all those lies (both public and private) that usually go along with keeping mistresses and fathering “love” children...
(Excerpt) Read more at modernconservative.com ...
Same feminists who think Clinton is good looking and Hillary is the best thing since sliced bread?
nature or nurture?
and some important democrat guy is throwing his sperm around nature.
I’m kind of surprised that this is the first time he got caught. I doubt it’s the first time he cheated.
Can he possibly be smarter than any of us previously thought? LOL!
Probably a bunch of lesbians are pissed off.

I'm sorry....everyone will get a new keyboard....and a Vista Service Pack 24 Update.
Here is what is going on.
They think they are better than everyone else. They are turning Edwards and his wife into scapegoats for all of them.
Two facts relevant here: 1. Dems are self-loathing people. 2. Dems regard the sins of one as the sins of the whole group, esp where conservatives are concerned.
They can jump on Edwards and offer him as a democrat purging sacrifice for all their sins. The party and their own consciences will be pure again once the two bad seeds are cast out and crushed. They will be able to live comfortably in their own skins, at least for a little while - until the unquenchable liberal guilt comes back again.
That is what is going on.
“All in all, it will be interesting to see if the gal pundits on the conservative side of the fence muster as much venom over Edwards martial infidelity as the lefties at the Huffington Post”
Ann is having fun with Edwards. I haven’t seen her so coltish in ages.
They are mad because he cheated while she sick and venerable In a feminist mind all rich man are pigs And should be taken advantage of to free up the women to be able to live an unburdened life except when that women is sick then its hands off because its not a level playing field
And this surprises those broads?
Don't foget that Mrs. Edwards attacked Ann Coulter on the Chrissy Matthews show for saying language that was probably a lot milder than what she was saying to her husband.
The hypocrisy and stand-by-your-man behavior from these Democratic feminists is most annoying.
You better keep your promise!
‘Don’t foget that Mrs. Edwards attacked Ann Coulter..’
We Ann fans forget nothing.
The hypocrite feminists can afford to make Edwards their whipping boy, after biting their tongues over Clinton-Edwards isn’t President, his hanky-panky doesn’t put their agenda of abortion, destruction of the family, and hamstringing of men in society, at risk. If he’d been President, they’d be covering his azz just like they did with Clinton. As someone else posted, they probably think that jumping on Edwards (and on his wife too, no less! just goes to show the boundlessness of the hypocrisy on their parts) wipes the slate till the next time. If another high-ranking ‘rat with any kind of real power should be shown to be cheating, they’ll be back to the excuses.
(answer: They knew it all along, but covered for him because he was 'useful' to their 'cause')
Up to this point most feminists I’ve talked too have chosen John Edwards as the #2 behind Hillary.
Funny that only now do they see the Breck Girl’s flaws....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.