[MrB]

The genetic variation will arise and has been mapped back and compared to the original genome.

I don't believe this to be true and require supporting data if you wish to stand on this argument. And even if so, it does not point to the ADDITION of information (required to extrapolate your observations to "molecules to man"), just a variation on EXISTING information.

Do you think that a population derived from a single organism will all be genetically identical?

No, given that a single human pair has the EXISTING genetic information to produce 10^2017 genetically non-identical offspring, this means that there is a huge pre-existing potential for adaptation to natural selection pressures.

What assumptions do you have?
No Creator, therefore the observed behaviors must be due to natural/material causes. I see X behavior, it's due to material cause Y, therefore, no need for a Creator or design.

And, this justifies an individual need for there not to be a Creator.

[allmendream]

I am a Christian and do believe the universe was created. I just don't believe for a second that God created a stupid universe where living systems are incapable of the adaptation that we so obviously see.

So you admit that it is IMPOSSIBLE for a genetically identical population to derive from a single organism.

Was nylonase a variation of existing information? Seems that it was NEW useful information (how to break down nylon)derived from OLD less useful information (how to break down an ester).

Why do you assume that variation of existing data cannot produce new data?