You are observing the _expression_ of genetic information, you are not observing the genetic variation.
You have not mapped the genome of the original organism and then that of the adapted organism to show that there is added information in the genome of the adapted organism.
Observation equally supports the conclusion that the information necessary for the adaptation pre-existed in the original orgamism. Some populations are able to express it, others are not and therefore do not pass on this ability to express to their progeny. Natural selection at work.
Again, you are BLIND TO YOUR ASSUMPTIONS. Probably willfully so, because your assumptions justify something else.
Do you think that a population derived from a single organism will all be genetically identical? How could they maintain absolute genetic fidelity when DNA polymerase is prone to errors?
As long as you are engaged in mind reading why don't you tell me what you think my “assumptions” are an attempt to justify?