A poster with a clue.
Since the entire story was not posted, the perp looks like the victim.
With the laundry list of her background, and her child endangerment which probably wasn’t the first time, the officer deserves commendation.
He didn’t see the boy through the tented windows but though the boy was shot in the leg, compared what the mother has been doing right along, the officer probably saved the boy’s life by getting her behind bars
He didn’t see the boy through the tented windows but though the boy was shot in the leg, compared what the mother has been doing right along, the officer probably saved the boy’s life by getting her behind bars"
So you're saying that he was precognizant of her background and was able to do a breathalyzer from 15 feet away and through 2 closed car doors and thus concluded that it was okay to shoot her. And is it your earnestly held belief then, that crimes committed against people with a "laundry list of her background" are to be commended and legally should just be a mulligan???
I hope the "pol" in your username refers to politician and not police, or else I hope that some sane person relieves you of your tin shield and gun immediately before you can continue to wipe your butt with the Constitution.
So anyone with a bad background should be shot?
He didn’t see the boy through the tented windows but though the boy was shot in the leg, compared what the mother has been doing right along, the officer probably saved the boy’s life by getting her behind bars.
I keep hearing that he couldn't see through the tinted windows. If so, what was his target?