He didnt see the boy through the tented windows but though the boy was shot in the leg, compared what the mother has been doing right along, the officer probably saved the boys life by getting her behind bars"
So you're saying that he was precognizant of her background and was able to do a breathalyzer from 15 feet away and through 2 closed car doors and thus concluded that it was okay to shoot her. And is it your earnestly held belief then, that crimes committed against people with a "laundry list of her background" are to be commended and legally should just be a mulligan???
I hope the "pol" in your username refers to politician and not police, or else I hope that some sane person relieves you of your tin shield and gun immediately before you can continue to wipe your butt with the Constitution.
I live in San Diego where this took place.
We have more news and outlook what went on.
not just a TV station blurb.
I am a ret. legal asst. with the County Attys.
I have a litle more knowledge of the laws and have
worked over the years on Homicide to child abuse cases
and everything inbetween.
When the St. Atty Gen. took over this case to investigate
the gal, even the left wing bleeding heart Atty Gen. threw the book at her.
Many people I know who are liberals and not the ones to jump on the pro police bandwagon, support what he did.
The St. Atty Gen’s 32 page report is on line.
read it and then comment.