Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SolidWood
A genuine pro-life stance requires a pro-family position.

An absurdly illogical statement. A single woman, who becomes pregnant and chooses to have the child instead of having an abortion, is not genuinely pro-life because she has no husband. I'm sorry, that's a complete crock.

45 posted on 08/13/2008 6:45:39 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: dmz

See #39.


46 posted on 08/13/2008 6:48:39 AM PDT by pgyanke (Public "servants" have decided it's their job to use the public's money to fight the public)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: dmz
A single woman, who becomes pregnant and chooses to have the child instead of having an abortion, is not genuinely pro-life because she has no husband.

Of course her decision not to abort is the only right one, but the kid then still needs a father. Such a single mom, due to circumstances (for example dumped by boyfriend/husband), of course is pro-life. But for the good of her child she should look for a father for the kid. I don't blame them at all.

However a single Mom (or Lesbian couples) who rejects the concept of fatherhood/male-female partnership and decides on purpose to have a child without a father is cruel and hampering to the development of the child. Of course she should not abort. But artificial insemnation should be only a option for couples unable to produce children in the first place. Not for single women/same-sex couples who reject the concept of a family.

48 posted on 08/13/2008 7:12:57 AM PDT by SolidWood (God Bless Georgia and grant them victory over Russia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson