Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dmz
A single woman, who becomes pregnant and chooses to have the child instead of having an abortion, is not genuinely pro-life because she has no husband.

Of course her decision not to abort is the only right one, but the kid then still needs a father. Such a single mom, due to circumstances (for example dumped by boyfriend/husband), of course is pro-life. But for the good of her child she should look for a father for the kid. I don't blame them at all.

However a single Mom (or Lesbian couples) who rejects the concept of fatherhood/male-female partnership and decides on purpose to have a child without a father is cruel and hampering to the development of the child. Of course she should not abort. But artificial insemnation should be only a option for couples unable to produce children in the first place. Not for single women/same-sex couples who reject the concept of a family.

48 posted on 08/13/2008 7:12:57 AM PDT by SolidWood (God Bless Georgia and grant them victory over Russia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: SolidWood

OK. I think I see where you are going.

Are you suggesting that the state (I don’t know who else you would have enforce your ‘artificial insemnation should be only a option for couples unable to produce children in the first place’) determine who can and cannot have children via artificial insemination?

Do you really want the state involved in that?


49 posted on 08/13/2008 7:24:40 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson