I’m for US sovereignty too. At the same time, a body of a hundred free nations could counter the madness being spewed by the UN, not to mention the other UN problems. For those who don’t know, the UN was founded by Soveit spy— Alger Hiss [one of Truman’s ideas— even after being warned that Hiss was a spy].
But aren’t you’re merely trading one supra-national bureacracy for another?
In my judgment, the United States has obligations belonging to no other nation on Earth. To subject the fulfilling of those obligations to approval of any “council of nations” is to renege our duties - in principal, and quite often in fact.
Why, for instance, should we await the U.N.’s approval before protecting our country? Or why should we await approval of a “League of Democracies” before freeing a people from tyrannical butchers?
We need to do what is right regardless of other nations’ opinions of us. We ought to be ignoring the U.N., not replacing it.