Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: roamer_1

We all have our personal litmus tests for our candidates.

Some won’t vote for a man unless he’s 100% right on every issue they hold. That is one extreme.

Some will vote for anyone with an R by their name, regardless. That’s another extreme.

Myself, I look at which electable candidate would do a better job leading this nation. There is no contest whatsoever. McCain is the obvious choice. I am a patriot. I will do what’s best for my country, without “holding my nose.”

McCain is about 90% where I am politically. That is far and away enough for me.


16 posted on 08/11/2008 12:36:46 AM PDT by Marie2 (Osama & Obama - both have friends who've bombed the Pentagon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Marie2
McCain is about 90% where I am politically. That is far and away enough for me.

For me, the very first litmus test is character, of which McCain is without completely and utterly, so I need go no further. He is not worthy of the office.

Outside of that, if I were to go forward (which I will not), he is no where near me politically, especially in his collusion with the likes of Feingold, Kennedy, and Clinton. One cannot be conservative in the least and find agreement or compromise therein.

I can really find no redeeming feature in him, with the solitary exception of his somewhat reasonable experience in military matters and foreign policy. But his inherently poor character traits, his obsession with globalism, and his compromise with the worst of the Marxists in our government far outweigh that solitary advantage.

Putting one's faith in the faithless, expecting a betrayer not to betray yet again, is a fool's errand.

18 posted on 08/11/2008 12:58:18 AM PDT by roamer_1 (Globalism is just Socialism in a business suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Marie2
McCain is about 90% where I am politically. That is far and away enough for me.

That is about where I stand. Although I know McCain is going to cross the line on many issues, its the best choice.

Unfortunately Alan Keyes lost his relevancy a long time ago, and seems headstrong in making himself even more irrelevant.

49 posted on 08/11/2008 7:40:55 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Marie2

I took the essay to mean that Keyes is criticizing Dobson for the change in his position, based upon the reason that he gave for making it in the first place.

Really, if he intended to do a flip flop, Dobson should never have made that statement in the first place.

Keyes is taking Dobson to task for his inconsistency. If you never made a statement like Dobson, that you would never vote for McCain out of conscience, then it doesn’t have relevance toward you.

I read most of this and just garnered criticism for Dobson out of it which he richly deserves for his behavior this election season.


210 posted on 08/11/2008 9:06:16 PM PDT by daylilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson