Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BunnySlippers

There is something fishy about this loose woman suddenly wanting “privacy” and rejecting a DNA test to establish paternity of the baby.
Either part of her pay-off was that she would never “out” Edwards, or she had multiple partners and passed off the child as his so he would pay hush money. Either way, she would have to get off the gravy train.
There is poetic justice that this ambulance chaser is being ripped off by someone just a sleazy as he is.


26 posted on 08/10/2008 12:49:58 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kittymyrib
There is something fishy about this loose woman suddenly wanting “privacy” and rejecting a DNA test to establish paternity of the baby. Either part of her pay-off was that she would never “out” Edwards, or she had multiple partners and passed off the child as his so he would pay hush money. Either way, she would have to get off the gravy train.

I am convinced that Edwards is NOT the father of the baby. He would never have publicly proclaimed his willingness to take a DNA test if he had not ALREADY taken one. All that a DNA test would require is a quick swab of the baby's cheek with a Q-Tip. That is probably why he met them at the hotel last month.

Hunter was milking Edwards for money telling him that he was the father. Now Edwards knows he is not the father, but cannot come clean about the DNA test because the fact that he needed one would prove that he was still having sex with her after his wife's cancer came out of remission.

So he admits to the affair, but denies he could be the baby based on the timing. Eventually, a DNA test will be publicly performed and Edwards will be able to claim that he was telling the truth all along.

Yes, it is a Machiavellian theory, but Edwards made millions as a trial lawyer.

33 posted on 08/10/2008 1:07:59 PM PDT by kennedy (No relation to Teddy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: kittymyrib

“There is something fishy about this loose woman suddenly wanting “privacy” and rejecting a DNA test to establish paternity of the baby. Either part of her pay-off was that she would never “out” Edwards, or she had multiple partners and passed off the child as his so he would pay hush money. Either way, she would have to get off the gravy train.
There is poetic justice that this ambulance chaser is being ripped off by someone just a sleazy as he is.”

I believe she is covering for Edwards because she really believes once Elizabeth dies that Edwards will marry her. Her not allowing her baby to have the DNA test gives Edwards feedom to say he is not the father and would submit to the DNA test to prove it. Edwards knew all along the test will not be done so he knew he was safe to say he would take the test. All planned ahead! As for Elizabeth, I feel sorry for her going through cancer. But the more I think about all the lies coming from them, I now wonder if Elizabeth is really at the “terminal” stage. I hope she isn’t, but wish she would come to her senses, hire a great attourney and sue Edwards big time!


34 posted on 08/10/2008 1:20:09 PM PDT by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson