I have a theory.... his contention that they didn't screw such that the baby is his, is FLAWED. Consider:
2006: She seduces him (flattery, crazy sex, whatever)... the affair goes on for a while, then he gets nervous, knowing that it's trouble for his ambitions.
She sees the nervousness, and manages to capture and secret away a quantity of his sperm as a hedge against a future breakup.
He breaks up with her.
2007: She, convinced that he'll be the next President, impregnates herself with the saved sperm. Obviously, runs the pregnancy to term... but then he's no longer in the running for President! What to do?
2008: Simple. She can't play the baby card while Eliz is alive. So, she refuses a DNS test until after Eliz dies. Then she can claim Johnny-boy for her own.
None if the above is to excuse Johnny-boy. He didn't have to plunge his poker into her pu**y.
Nevertheless -- never trust a woman. They're much smarter and devious than we are. ;-)
Ahhh, the voice of experience...
No, I think it's less complex. It's his baby, but he doesn't want that info to come out while his wife is alive. After that, it will come out. He has promised the loon that they will be together after that, but I doubt he means it.
I am not laughing at what you’ve posited. CA saw more than a rash of females saving used condoms for exactly those purposes. The message loud and clear, brother to brother, throughout CA in the late 90s was: Don’t just use it; dispose of it immediately.