U.S. can be partly blamed for war – ex Georgian FM

RussiaToday ^ | 8/10/2008

[1rudeboy]

Bush’s Fault! I knew it!

[brushcop]

Screw you all, good luck...

[AnalogReigns]

the question is by whom? Definitely, not by Russia

Right, just by Russian tanks, troops, canons, and planes....but hey, its the U.S.A.'s fault!

[paltz]

3...2...1..blaming the world’s problem’s on the USA right on schedule!

[Centurion2000]

A number of experts agree the military conflict between Georgia and South Ossetia is not in Russia’s interests.

A number of these experts are idiots. This is exactly in line with Russian 'interests'. Doesn't make it right.

[FlingWingFlyer]

"As I understand..."

In other words, she's as clueless as our Nazi Pelosi.

[Technogeeb]

The Former Georgian Foreign Minister Salome Zurabishvili says the United States could be partly responsible for the violence in South Ossetia.

If they really think we are the devil, then let's send them to Hell.

Dear Georgia,
Is there anything in the US military inventory that you would like to borrow?

Your pal,
Lend-Lease v2.0

[FreeReign]

A number of experts agree the military conflict between Georgia and South Ossetia is not in Russia’s interests. The Former Georgian Foreign Minister Salome Zurabishvili says the United States could be partly responsible for the violence in South Ossetia.

Zurabishvili is a French nationalist who never visted Georgia until she was 34.

Read more about her here

[denydenydeny]

Bush’s Fault! I knew it!

Yeah, the clock was ticking. You knew the MSM was desperately looking for an "official" person to officially pronounce the whole thing Bush's fault.

[Navy Patriot]

It has to be true, it comes from France, Austria and Russia.

[bereanway]

The main purpose behind the conflict is the further strategic orientation of Georgia and an opportunity for the West, I mean the USA and the EU, to count on Georgia and the Caucasus in ensuring the strategic provision of oil”.

Huh, how can this conflict ensure oil to the USA and EU? That’s what Georgia and the BTC pipeline did before the conflict, now that’s in doubt. So we baited Russia into Georgia to somehow ensure Georgia’s strategic importance to the West.

Brilliant.

[Anti-Bubba182]

"The military assault in South Ossetia was launched deliberately, and the question is by whom? Definitely, not by Russia, as it’s not in the country’s interests,” he said."

BIG LIE!

[tina07]

Naturally!!/sarc

[Larry381]

It's Bush's fault-why didn't I think of that because he's also responsible for:

global warming

all the wars in the last century

Pearl Harbor

The German invasion of Poland

The loss of China

The Russians acquiring the H bomb

AIDS

herpes

9/11

Crime in Detroit

low tire pressure on US cars

Rielle Hunter's baby

The latest beef recall

Bernie Mac's death

Spam

Microsoft Vista

heroin addiction in Siberia

The oil leak in my car's engine

I'll post the balance later, my finger and my hair hurt too much to continue

[berdie]

I can’t top that!!!

Of course we are responsible for everything...

[AmericanExceptionalist]

A number of experts agree the military conflict between Georgia and South Ossetia is not in Russia’s interests.

Totally aside from the obvious fallcay of an appeal to authority (argumentum ad verecundiam), the insipid phrase, "[a] number of experts agree," free of any specific examples, should automatically disqualify the succeeding words from any serious consideration.

[El Gato]

The Russians had this all lined up didn't they? Propaganda and all. Ready to go.

I could see that on last night's, US time, Russia Today, mere hours after the Russian tanks began to roll.

[Grimmy]

“[a] number of experts agree,”

I’m guessing it’s experts in manipulating the French social welfare system that provided this particular person her opinion.

[Domandred]

Definitely, not by Russia

So what other country has a large inventory of Russian tanks, planes, and oh yea Russian troops, that can move into that area without pissing of oh um Russia?