To: marktwain
He shot the guy, he wasn’t dead and he took him out and dumped him? That is awful! He should have called police and an ambulance. There were 3 other witnesses to the robbery and shooting to corroborate his story.
3 posted on
08/08/2008 6:07:59 AM PDT by
Ditter
To: Ditter
Home invading scumbag “doesn’t want to live like that”? All the more reason to make sure he DOES survive.
4 posted on
08/08/2008 6:11:12 AM PDT by
Diggler
(We will be beaten with our own virtue. Proud American Infidel!)
To: Ditter
He shot the guy, he wasn’t dead and he took him out and dumped him? That is awful! He should have called police and an ambulance. There were 3 other witnesses to the robbery and shooting to corroborate his story. It sounded like he was just complying with the wishes of the person he shot. He couldn't call the police because then he would have been guilty of a felony himself. Same for taking the person he shot to the hospital.
After a person has paid their debt to society they should have all of their rights restored. Too many of our laws are designed solely to create criminals.
5 posted on
08/08/2008 6:14:10 AM PDT by
LeGrande
To: Ditter
"He shot the guy, he wasn’t dead and he took him out and dumped him? That is awful!"You're right:
he should have shot him again.
7 posted on
08/08/2008 6:22:41 AM PDT by
Redbob
("WWJBD" ="What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
To: Ditter
He should have made sure that the guy was dead, dead.
11 posted on
08/08/2008 7:00:38 AM PDT by
ANGGAPO
(Layte Gulf BeachClub)
To: Ditter
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson