Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ditter
He shot the guy, he wasn’t dead and he took him out and dumped him? That is awful! He should have called police and an ambulance. There were 3 other witnesses to the robbery and shooting to corroborate his story.

It sounded like he was just complying with the wishes of the person he shot. He couldn't call the police because then he would have been guilty of a felony himself. Same for taking the person he shot to the hospital.

After a person has paid their debt to society they should have all of their rights restored. Too many of our laws are designed solely to create criminals.

5 posted on 08/08/2008 6:14:10 AM PDT by LeGrande
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: LeGrande

I read the article. He should have called police and an ambulance.


6 posted on 08/08/2008 6:17:25 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: LeGrande
After a person has paid their debt to society they should have all of their rights restored.

Thus one generations mercy is changed into another's injustice. In the bad old days, felonies meant death, mutilation, or banishment. In mercy it was decided that one could serve some time in jail and lose some rights. Now that is thought of as too harsh.

Mind you, I am coming to agree that the war on drugs is creating more problems than it seems to be solving. There's some question about the fairness of some drug felony laws. But the notion that in felonies generally more is at stake than time in jail is not a priori a bad one.

24 posted on 08/09/2008 11:03:01 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson