Wow. An unexpected result from California. The times are changing!
1 posted on
08/08/2008 6:01:54 AM PDT by
marktwain
To: marktwain
Looks like he may be a victim of the war on some drugs, though. He could not legally posses his means of defense because of a drug conviction from the 90’s.
2 posted on
08/08/2008 6:03:44 AM PDT by
marktwain
To: marktwain
He shot the guy, he wasn’t dead and he took him out and dumped him? That is awful! He should have called police and an ambulance. There were 3 other witnesses to the robbery and shooting to corroborate his story.
3 posted on
08/08/2008 6:07:59 AM PDT by
Ditter
To: marktwain
Police came to the house six hours later to talk to Nichols about a report of shots fired,... After six hours, why bother?
To: marktwain; DaveLoneRanger
With three other witnesses something stinks about this story. Sounds like a drug deal gone bad (or good?) And why isn’t he being arrested as a felon in possession of a firearm...
13 posted on
08/08/2008 8:50:00 AM PDT by
tubebender
(Why does a round pizza come in a square box?)
To: marktwain
Definately an odd one.
We need to end posession laws. If anyone shouldn’t be trusted with a gun they shouldn’t be walking the streets anyway.
To: marktwain
21 posted on
08/08/2008 11:14:07 AM PDT by
wastedyears
(Show me your precious darlings, and I will crush them all)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson