Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: LdSentinal
The UK press has reported the story our MSM refuses to touch.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
2 posted on
08/07/2008 10:37:26 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: LdSentinal
Barack Obama is being ordered to ... Some leader!
3 posted on
08/07/2008 10:37:50 AM PDT by
pnh102
(Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
To: LdSentinal
...ignored by the mainstream media until yesterday when the National Enquirer printed a grainy photograph allegedly showing Mr Edwards cradling the baby... National Enquirer is now MSM?..............
4 posted on
08/07/2008 10:37:55 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(All that carbon in all that oil and coal was once in the atmosphere. We're just putting it back.....)
To: LdSentinal
How was this guy an asset to the Democrats anyway? Is NObomba so stupid that he would consider this liability a viable candidate even without the love child?
Ok ok ok . . . no need to answer that.
To: LdSentinal
Obama is being ORDERED????
who is doing the odering? and will this person/people still control the O-man when he’s in the oval office?
6 posted on
08/07/2008 10:39:00 AM PDT by
camle
(keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
To: LdSentinal
I’ve gone to a few dim-o-blogs and can’t believe there are still people strongly denying what will be proven valid. These people would never risk another lawsuit from an ambulance chaser. It’s true, it’s leaking and they will sink with their stupidity.
7 posted on
08/07/2008 10:40:48 AM PDT by
King Hawk
To: LdSentinal
...fear he [Edwards] is taking attention away from Mr Obama.
Outrageous! This is when grateful populace should be focused on listening to every word that leaves Obama's mouth. Outrageous!
8 posted on
08/07/2008 10:41:08 AM PDT by
alecqss
To: LdSentinal
A. don’t see how this possibly hurts Obama. B. Daily Mail is about the same level as National Enquirer
To: LdSentinal
“John Edwards love child rumours threaten the Barack Obama presidential campaign”
Are there allegations of a threesome or something?
If not, why in the heck would this endanger Obama’s campaign.
It looks to me like he’s already formulating a list of reasons why he didn’t win (in addition to the main one, we are all racists, of course).
12 posted on
08/07/2008 10:50:50 AM PDT by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
To: LdSentinal
I'm trying to figure out how we could make hay with Mr Two Americas' absence from the convention.If an ad was run saying something like "John Edwards didn't even show up" his office could respond by announcing "I was at home caring for my dying wife....sucka!"
Any ideas?
To: LdSentinal
John Edwards love child rumors threaten the Barack Obama presidential campaign
What difference does this make? Unless Barack is John Edwards’ love child? Wait a minute Barack is someone else's love child. Of course that could be a problem if Mr. Edwards has a time machine?
15 posted on
08/07/2008 10:56:00 AM PDT by
2001convSVT
("People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence")
To: LdSentinal
LOLs...The crappy UK press reports the story that the even crappier US Moron Media refuses to touch.
I think the US Moron Media has jumped the shark...2008 may be the year of the accelerated extinction of all these crappers!
16 posted on
08/07/2008 10:57:15 AM PDT by
iopscusa
(El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
To: LdSentinal
17 posted on
08/07/2008 10:58:07 AM PDT by
Paladin2
(Huma for co-president! (it ain't over 'til it's over))
To: LdSentinal
The topic on Air America this morning was ‘Should John Edwards be aloud to speak at the convention?
It was pretty funny listening to the airheads defend him.
To: LdSentinal
For those wondering how this could affect Obama. Obama now has a decision to make. If he does not invite Edwards to speak at the convention he will alienate many many Edwards supporters. If he does allow him to speak it brings the controversy to the floor.
To: LdSentinal
It is becoming increasingly clear that Obama’s VP pick is going to loom large by the convention and Hillary will be sharing his spotlight if not the backseat.
24 posted on
08/07/2008 11:06:11 AM PDT by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: LdSentinal
Party organisers are furious that Mr Edwards has refused to deny that hes the father of Rielle Hunters baby daughter Frances Wonder why that is?
To: LdSentinal
Funny, but I could swear I saw the Globe supermarket tabloid yesterday with a cover story claiming Obama had a love child, too.
29 posted on
08/07/2008 11:12:32 AM PDT by
Fresh Wind
(Five Year Plans and New Deals, wrapped in golden chains...)
To: LdSentinal
“Party organisers are furious that Mr Edwards has refused to deny that hes the father of Rielle Hunters baby daughter Frances and fear he is taking attention away from Mr Obama. “
_________________
Gee whiz....leave him alone already! Why are they insisting he had lying to his sin list of adultery and fornication???
(sarc.)
37 posted on
08/07/2008 11:25:24 AM PDT by
cowdog77
To: LdSentinal
Is this the same way Barry was ordered to distance himself from Larry Sinclair?
38 posted on
08/07/2008 11:28:28 AM PDT by
dforest
(I had almost forgotten that McCain is the nominee. Too bad I was reminded.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson