Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State's Fiscal Woes Mounting
ALG News ^ | 08/07/08 | Howie Rich

Posted on 08/07/2008 9:13:56 AM PDT by vmorgs

Last December, it was already becoming apparent that state governments across America were headed for some dire financial straits.

Even the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, hardly a free market think tank, said at that time thirteen states were facing revenue shortfalls totaling $23 billion.

Of course, these quickly became the “good ole days” once the Center released an updated analysis this summer, showing twenty-nine states facing shortfalls of $48 billion.

How did things get so out of control, so quickly?

Not surprisingly, it started with rampant overspending. In fact, the average state grew government by 9.3% last year and 8.7% the year before—well above the already-high thirty-year average growth rate of 6.4%, a figure which, incidentally, is well above the annual growth in population and inflation.

Not to be outdone, Washington politicians over the past two years have lumped another trillion dollars onto our national debt – the interest payments on which alone now total over $400 billion a year.

At all levels of government, politicians simply couldn’t contain themselves with so much new money flowing into their coffers. And so rather than shoring up reserves or investing in our economy via tax cuts, they chose instead to spend billions of surplus dollars on more government.

Now the chickens are coming home to roost.

States are being hit with declining revenues due to depressed consumer earnings and spending, two factors which are exacerbated by astronomical gas prices and the collapse of America’s housing market.

And so, as was the case during the post-September 11 downturn, the time has come once again for choosing.

Put simply, will politicians trim the multiple new layers of bureaucratic fat that they’ve just created? Or will they follow the ageless big government playbook and threaten to wield their budget axe over vital services in an effort to bully taxpayers into accepting “revenue enhancements.”

We’re all familiar with Ronald Reagan’s quip that “nothing is as permanent as a temporary government program.”

Well, to that we should add “nothing is as irreplaceable as a new government bureaucrat,” particularly during economic downturns.

And just as politicians have failed to stimulate economic growth with tax cuts during the good times, they have also failed to cut the pork during the bad times that inevitably follow their spending orgies.

Three main factors contribute to this ongoing cycle of fiscal negligence.

First, the majority of state governments spend your tax dollars based on institutional needs, not specific outcomes. In positive revenue years, new programs are created and old programs get automatic budget increases—regardless of their effectiveness. In negative revenue years, politicians again take the easy way out by implementing across-the-board cuts.

As a result, funding streams continue to follow the needs of bureaucratic fiefdoms, not the citizens those agencies are supposed to serve, and the list of things government does that it shouldn’t do continues to grow.

Second – unlike powerful labor unions and other special interests—the individual citizens most affected by revenue downturns don’t have a voice in the process. They can’t afford to dispatch armies of well-heeled lobbyists to state capitals across the country, or hold high-dollar fundraisers for the politicians who ultimately must choose what gets cut during lean times.

Ironically, the lobbyists whose salaries they do pay for are focused exclusively on protecting bureaucratic turf, which is why it’s no surprise that institutional voices invariably drown out those of the taxpayers whenever budget “axes” fall.

Finally, governments across the country continue to operate under the flawed assumption that they can spend their way out of difficult economic times – just as they operate under the flawed assumption that they can spend without consequence during boom times.

Neither approach has ever done anything to grow our economy, just more government at the expense of our economy.

State leaders facing revenue shortfalls this year have a rare opportunity to fundamentally shift this paradigm, but doing so will require standing up to the powerful unions and government interests who continue to feed off of our nation’s taxpayers.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: budget; economy; govwatch; states

1 posted on 08/07/2008 9:13:57 AM PDT by vmorgs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vmorgs
Our AZ gubmint did the same thing. Now, with the budget a mess, the guv wants to increase the state sales tax, and has talked of instituting a state property tax.

They will never get it.

2 posted on 08/07/2008 9:22:22 AM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmorgs
The public employees unions are now running radio ads in California featuring bureaucrats whining about the job and pay cuts and how important they as a group are.

Between them and the illegals in California, there will be no hope for a budget that doesn't feature massive taxes with massive borrowing.

3 posted on 08/07/2008 9:30:59 AM PDT by Regulator (Obama = Mugabe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmorgs
Well it'll be interesting what Gov. Stickland does since three of our cities have just been declared by Forbes as being a few of the Fastest Declining Cities in the country........and they are: Canton, OH., Youngstown, OH., and Cleveland, OH.

Ohio is turning into a sh!thole and the democrats are in charge! I hope we can find a job outside of this state because I really want to move away. Although I have to say, Cincinnati is a beautiful city compared to the rest of the cities in the state.

4 posted on 08/07/2008 9:55:05 AM PDT by thingumbob (Dead terrorists don't make more terrorists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Yeah, have you heard the one with the mom and her kid asking about the “budgets cuts”? The mom spouts all kind of dire warnings about the kids teacher getting laid off, overcrowded classrooms, no more art and music classes, yada, yada. But all could be solved if the politicans would just support education and pass the (bloated tax-raising Democrat) budget. And the kid chimes in they need to do it to “save my future”.

It’s really a disgusting commercial, no doubt paid for by the teachers union.


5 posted on 08/07/2008 12:12:36 PM PDT by jrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson