Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Man50D

There is nothing wrong with San Francisco that couldn’t be cured by a 8.9 or 9.2 earthquake. San Francsco is just not required.


29 posted on 08/07/2008 4:38:31 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Conservation? Let the NE Yankees freeze.... in the dark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bert
There is nothing wrong with San Francisco that couldn’t be cured by a 8.9 or 9.2 earthquake. San Francsco is just not required.

It is the ONE city...the ONLY one...where the introduction of a terrorist thermonuclear device would leave me utterly unconcerned.

I know...that is a horrid and ghastly thing to say or think. However, the very definition of "horrid and ghastly" is taking place on the very streets of San Fran Sicko.

That running, infected sore of a city needs to be 'excised' as soon as possible.

76 posted on 08/07/2008 9:27:56 AM PDT by hoagy62 (No surrender, no retreat, no quarter, no compromise...no kidding!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson