Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Republican Rebellion Continues (Jed Babbin from the House Floor)
Human Events ^ | 5 August 2008 | Jed Babbin

Posted on 08/05/2008 5:05:25 AM PDT by SE Mom

It’s enough to make you weep. Conservative House Republicans -- led by Indiana’s Mike Pence and Georgia’s Tom Price -- took Friday’s spontaneous outburst against Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s summer adjournment without a vote on offshore drilling and turned it into an organized revolt that was melting the Capitol’s telephone and fax lines. And then the White House announced that the President wouldn’t call the House back for a special session to deal with the gasoline price crisis.

But the House Republicans aren’t dismayed. This isn’t about the President, one told me last evening. It’s about putting pressure on the Speaker. They plan to have a full team on the House floor at least all this week.

Yesterday, I sat on the House floor – among members, staff, tourists and other journalists – while Reps. Pence, Price, Duncan Hunter (R-Ca) and Jeb Hensarling (R-Tx) made impassioned but well-reasoned speeches about why Congress should return from its just begun 5-week taxpayer-funded vacation to vote on an energy bill aimed at relieving the problem that’s affecting every American voter.

The Republicans’ action began as a stunt on Friday and by Monday had evolved into a well-organized effort that might just succeed: if enough pressure were brought on Pelosi to force a vote on a comprehensive energy package, she might have to budge either by bringing Congress back in August (admittedly a very long-shot) or by holding a vote when the House reconvenes in September.

Republicans, as Hensarling said, define “comprehensive” as not “drill or, but drill and”, meaning that they would couple conservation measures with opening offshore drilling and on-land oil reserves such as the Colorado oil shale.

By Monday, Pence and Price had gotten about twenty fellow Republicans to come back for the new debate, and more were still being rounded up. As many as one hundred may be back by week’s end. If they are successful in building momentum this week, the debates will go on -- possibly -- all to the way into September.

Pence told the audience, “Because the American people aren’t getting a vacation from $4/gallon gasoline, Congress shouldn’t be taking a 5-week paid vacation.” He added, “Congress should be working in a bipartisan manner to give the American people more access to American oil.”

Hensarling (chairman of the Republican Study Committee, the official conservative Republican group) told me in a brief interview in the Republican cloakroom that it was rather doubtful that Pelosi would call Congress back. Pelosi, he said, was “wedded to a San Francisco extremist ideology that prevents her from understanding the pain being felt by real people.”

Both Pence and Hensarling understand the most important underlying issue. America’s is an oil-based economy. No matter how much people dream of converting to wind power or solar power or whatever, to bring relief to American consumers in the next several years, the answer has to be an increased supply of oil.

I asked Hensarling why, when America is so energy-rich, was our government insisting we remain energy-poor?

He said, “When Brazil discovered huge new offshore oil reserves, it caused a national celebration. It was a matter of pride. When we discover oil here – in Nancy Pelosi’s congress – it’s treated as a matter of shame.”

Later, on the House floor, Hensarling asked, “shouldn’t Congress cancel their vacation plans when families are canceling theirs because of high gas prices?” He invited Americans to call Pelosi’s office to express their support for the Republican revolt, giving the main Capitol number, 202-224-3121. (Pelosi’s office numbers are 202-225-0100 and 225-4965).

Pence, in his speech, pointed to a chart that showed about a half-dozen issues which Pelosi found time for debate in the House, such as “National Passport Month.”

The President’s announcement that he would not call Congress back for a special session may not kill the House revolt. And, in fact, it shouldn’t. For the same reason that the President’s immigration bill died in the Senate last year, this group of Republicans – finally finding their voice after being suppressed by Pelosi for more than a year – have a winning issue. And Americans are supporting them the same way we supported the opponents of the immigration bill last year.

Cong. Pence told me the phones were almost melting. Rush Limbaugh, Laura Ingraham and many of the other most prominent talk radio hosts were weighing in, accelerating the huge volume of calls and e-mails coming in.

Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain (R-Az) yesterday challenged congress to return to vote on legislation that would include the barriers to offshore drilling. He promised to return from the campaign trail to vote.

Make those calls, folks. Send those e-mails. This could be a winner.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 110th; congress; drilling; energy; gop; jedbabbin; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last
To: netmilsmom

Sometimes, working the issue is more advantageous than achieving an immediate solution.


81 posted on 08/05/2008 9:40:23 AM PDT by Prince Caspian (Don't ask if it's risky... Ask if the reward is worth the risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
Pelosi saw the handwriting on the wall and pulled the Cspan plug early.

Wait till the old Haight-Ashbury hippy gets to the life support stage. Her plug may be pulled.

82 posted on 08/05/2008 10:03:31 AM PDT by IbJensen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ArmedConservative
I agree with you as far as the President is concerned he can continue stating Congress went on vacation without voting on the most important issue facing the American people at present.

Also I have floating at the back of mind another theory. Not sure if that is valid or not.

Being English I am not familiar with rules for calling Congress back but I would assume it would be similar to calling our Parliament back which would only be done in dire circumstances, such as a major natural disaster, terrorism/war. To call them back for something that although important to the average American is not a life or death situation may well be thought not be something that a President would want to do.

I could see if he did the the President could be accused of using his powers for political and party reasons and not acting in the best interest of the country. Also once it has been done by one President then subsequent Presidents could would not think twice before doing something similar and in fact abusing their powers in a way that would be actually damaging for the country. Before a President does something he has to think about what could happen in the future and not legitimize something that could set a precedent for others to abuse in the future.

83 posted on 08/05/2008 11:07:24 AM PDT by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DGHoodini

You’ve got that right!

Going over the the live thread—hope I can catch up!


84 posted on 08/05/2008 11:20:51 AM PDT by GoldwaterChick (We Snowflakes will always remember our beloved Snowman with the incandescent smile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi(DNR)? >Bo)


85 posted on 08/05/2008 11:24:39 AM PDT by DGHoodini (Nor shall my sword sleep in my hand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

IMO, Congress gets a 52 week a year tax-payer funded vacation.

This Congress will set new records for doing nothing substantial to assist the American people.

Hope all the greenies and lefties are really happy with the way Pelosi has been behaving.


86 posted on 08/05/2008 11:27:11 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snugs
Good points in your #83 post. Here's one more reason and it's quite a bit more cynical than yours: If the House does NOT get called back to address this issue over the summer, it will come to a head at the end of September* and will be ongoing into October, IOW right before the election when EVERYBODY who cares is paying attention.

If Nancy were smart (she's not), she'd call 'em all back, allow the vote, and take her lumps gracefully when she loses.

Being graceful about it would help alleviate the Stalinist thug image she has put forth while getting it over with in August would make it a distant and fuzzy memory for many voters.

Also, it would give the MSM and Dems all of September till November to spin and make it look like the Republicans were the obstructionists while the righteous Dems prevailed and brought cheaper gas to the American voter...

*The congressional ban on offshore drilling EXPIRES at the end of September, so she HAS to allow a vote if she wants any chance of reinstating it. She may figure that just letting it expire would be less humiliating than losing a vote with HER people voting against her and showing her weakness.

87 posted on 08/05/2008 1:40:41 PM PDT by Sal (Letting the drilling ban expire in Sept-less humiliating to 9% Nan than losing vote, she's weak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Even if he called them back, he couldn't set the agenda. I think the longer this goes on in Congress, the better it is for Republicans.

I just heard Pelosi had given Dems the go ahead and campaign on the issue and say they were open to drilling and that she wouldn't let it come to the floor when they got back. In other words,LIE. "Claim to be in favor of drilling so you can get re-elected but you don't have to worry about having to follow through because I'll take the heat."

88 posted on 08/05/2008 1:41:47 PM PDT by bamagirl1944 (That's short for Alabama, not Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Coldwater Creek

It would have been nice if we had the 51 votes during that timeframe to pass energy-related bills.


89 posted on 08/06/2008 5:31:44 AM PDT by Terpfen (Romney's loss in Florida is STILL a catastrophe. Hello, McCandidate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
The oil/energy problem has been around since the early 1920’s. All of a sudden, we have an emergency!

Our people could have raised Cain, even without the majority vote.

The American people have no one to blame but themselves.

90 posted on 08/06/2008 6:18:19 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Coldwater Creek

Should’a, coulda, woulda, made changes/decisions before ...
But this is the time and these are the people that we are working with now ,

So encourage, and build up as best we can, to make changes/decisions that tend toward turning in a better way.

We got here by step by step increments and we must make step by step changes as we can.

Never give up! NEVER.

RARELY IS THERE ABRUPT CHANGE ... short of a revolution.


91 posted on 08/06/2008 8:01:29 AM PDT by geologist (The only answer to the troubles of this life is Jesus. A decision we all must make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson