Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lucky Lucky America
EcoWorld ^ | August 1st, 2008 | Ed Ring

Posted on 08/03/2008 9:28:10 AM PDT by Delacon

As a free nation, a democratic nation, and a global superpower, America’s fate, today more than ever, is to midwife and manage the emergence of the first world generation. Not an easy task, as technology and globalization make every surviving cultural tradition anywhere suddenly replaced or confronted by every other on this shrinking planet, and our polity grapples with it all.  It would be surprising indeed if America were not also considered a troubled nation, inflicting and incurring heartbreaking trauma every day in this imperfect world.  But America’s fate is also a stroke of exceptional luck and opportunity.

The message for Americans to send the modernizing, globalizing peoples of the world, through thick and thin, is how bad things were, and how good things have gotten, and how we are on the brink of the best things ever.  Despite lip service, sometimes effective agents of political change in America focus only on the worst possible end of things - endless war, imminent environmental apocalypse.  But the enduring agents of exponential change in the world are technology and democracy, and these are forces of incredible good, that have brought unprecedented prosperity and opportunity to humanity. In only fighting demons, America risks losing what makes her most great.  If dwelling on averting catastrophe replaces optimism and independent enterprise, America’s promise is at risk; her uniqueness, her gift to humanity.  Optimism and independent enterprise has driven America, draws people to America, defines America.  And like the flow of the river, optimism and enterprise cannot be kept down.  Complaining is no way to get up every morning.  Optimism, can-do, is America’s message to the world.
(post resumes below image)

 

Paddling towards pluralism.

 

Global environmentalism, despite a veneer of exhuberance and a facade of hope, today is mostly about doom and gloom.  Extreme environmentalists, more powerful today than ever, at root are complainers, they are indignant, they are doomsayers, and they are dominant today for reasons that ought to be challenged.  Perhaps the world is going to come to an end if we don’t all do exactly what they say.  And perhaps it will not.  In many cases environmentalism, and the policies to enforce it, already constitute the most regressive hidden tax in history, and global warming alarm will catapult these hidden taxes into the stratosphere of economic stagnation.  With carbon trading and carbon taxes and carbon offsets set to eclipse rational environmental policy, our economy and our way of life are what is in peril, not our planetary icecaps, and only financial traders, professional accountants, attorneys, credentialed consultants, academic experts, corporate cartels and the public sector will benefit.  The temple of ecological green will fill with the changers of the financial green, and common sense will be coopted and coerced by the color of money, no matter how the game is called, or how the rules are set.  With global warming alarmist policy, we will rob from the poor and give to the rich as never before.

There is a lot of junk science out there on both sides of the environmental debate, as always with all debates, but extreme environmentalist junk science seems to be carrying the day, so that is where we most appropriately ought to shine our scrutiny.  Daunting, to put it mildly, is the stupifying volume of all these authoritative and ostensibly terrifying studies.  Example - yet another recent (and highly publicized) report reviewed by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) called for additional and significant new regulations and levies.  Citing “expert” studies, the report projected approximately 300 additional deaths in California due to additional pollution over the next few decades, unless massive corrective actions are not immediately undertaken.  Despite its portentious tone, such a study is not an imperative, rationally compelling us to move towards a socialist police state, because it rests on utterly unimpressive projections - 300 deaths within a population of nearly 40 million is a statistically trivial outcome.  There are infinite and totally unforseeable random outcomes, from infinite conceivable causes, that could reduce a population of tens of millions by a few hundred lives over a few decades. 

The idea that anyone or any study can project economic or demographic results so far into the future with details so specific and fine is simply ridiculous. Equally absurd is that such fluff might suffice to justify transformative economic policies. If the California Air Resources Board takes something like this seriously, perhaps the entire agency should be eliminated and replaced with people who care about air pollution, not climate speculation and draconian policies that follow from such exercises of counting angels on the point of a needle.  Yet whether it is 15 score additional dead over decades, or catastrophic collapse of every global ecosystem in the world within the same brief span, extreme environmentalists carry the public scene today, preaching like the saviours in Salem, burning witches and pressing life out of the truth with relentless stones of rhetoric both formidable in craft and terrifying in content.

We need environmentalists, of course we do, but we need environmentalists who care about the difference between a million and a billion, or a thousand and a million, and who make judgements accordingly.  For informed citizens anywhere to leave both local and global environmental policy to a coterie of fanatics and their powerful opportunistic bedfellows - who hide behind opaque clouds of science as they unleash relentless media torrents, the sleet of indignation and the hailstones of fear - is tragic folly.  Anyone who has formed an opinion on any environmental issue needs to think for themselves what passes the smell test, what provides an acceptable cost/benefit, absolutely reject reflexive, unexamined demonization of anyone who disagrees, and demand access to better data, unfiltered and unbiased.

America is a lucky, lucky nation and perhaps cursed as well with troubles so huge, but complaining and doomsaying will not make the world better as fast as optimism and unfettered enterprise. Setting people free to compete, nurturing meritocracy, sustainably improving entitlements everywhere, encouraging building and development - and letting green resume its place within the dazzling full spectrum of reality - will help optimize economic growth and tolerance for pluralism; will help create the next step in the ascent of man.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: alarmism; california; climatechange; environment; exceptionalism; geopolitics; globalwarming; hume; junkscience
Simply the best editorial I've read about global warming alarmism and the US's role in confronting it.
1 posted on 08/03/2008 9:28:11 AM PDT by Delacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: steelyourfaith; Entrepreneur; Beowulf; CygnusXI; Defendingliberty; WL-law; Genesis defender; ...

ping


2 posted on 08/03/2008 9:30:14 AM PDT by Delacon ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

300 deaths? I met an older friend in a store parking lot yesterday who was wearing a breathing mask. We have had more than a month of smoke ladened air labeled as unhealthy or hazardous. The elderly and chronically ill are not even supposed to go outside. Our local city’s Administrator told me his workers can only work 20 minutes at a time then must come indoors to recover. We are told the fires will continue to burn until rains put them out in the fall. (They have consumed more than 100,000 acres so far in the county.)

How about the green’s moratorium on Forest management and their responsibility for policies that have built up forest fuels to unprecedented levels? Perhaps they should back away from the controls. They have done such a stellar job so far. sarcasm/


3 posted on 08/03/2008 10:11:14 AM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
Excellent editorial. It's well written and on the mark. One of the things that bothers me the most about modern liberals, with modern environmentalists merely an extreme subset, is their pessimism.

I'm an optimist by nature. I think things have generally gotten better and am old enough to remember when they were worse. There's more prosperity and freedom in the world than ever before. The air and water is cleaner. The food is more plentiful and more nutritious. I see opportunity, growth, improvement, and prosperity. The world is a fun place to live.

Yet, libs see a different world. Their world is gloomy and getting worse. We talk about prosperity, while they talk about sustainability. What does this mean, sustainability?

Scarcity. Shortages. Less and less of less. Constrain your dreams. Prepare for heartache. Don't try, it's not worth it.

The liberal’s world is a miserable place. It has no place in America, which is the land of opportunity and optimism.

As conservatives, our job is to find and front people in leadership roles who have contagious optimism, Reagan optimism.

People will not choose misery and scarcity if presented with a opportunity and prosperity as an alternative. We need to first fix the GOP and advance the best of us, not the least offensive of us.

Ironically, the libs are rallying around a Manchurian candidate who talks of hope in general terms, but speaks of scarcity when he gets specific. Thus, he avoids specifics. Pessimism is a loser and it is a wholly liberal and especially, environmental message.

Can we find an articulate optimist to present the alternative message?

4 posted on 08/03/2008 12:51:35 PM PDT by Entrepreneur (The environmental movement is filled with watermelons - green on the outside, red on the inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marsh2
We've had relatively few wildfires in AZ this year. It's partly because the monsoon rains came early, and I suspect partly because we've already burned so many acres over the past ten years.

Enviros are too arrogant to see the stupidity of their own actions. It's okay if 10,000 spotted owls burn to death, as long as the loggers don't disturb them.

5 posted on 08/03/2008 12:51:53 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet

We were discovering the double wammy in our area. These large fires are being fought with backfires to herd the fires away from areas. I bet in the aftermath, we will see the widespread devastation on wildlife that have been caught between the two.


6 posted on 08/03/2008 5:37:50 PM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marsh2
We have had several backfires started in spite of high wind warnings, that got out of control. Whatever the good intended, that doesn't make any sense.

In fact, most of the worst wildfires have been started by human stupidity.

There was the Rodeo-Chedeski fire in AZ, which burned 235,000 acres (360 square miles!) It was started on one end by a woman who got lost and ran out of gas in her SUV, and started a signal fire to save herself, and on the other end by a part-time fireman on an Indian reservation, because he wanted fire-fighting work.

Then there was the Mt. Lemmon fire, that burned dozens of houses to the ground, because some idiot flicked a cigarette butt into the weeds.

Then there was that massive Hayman CO fire started by a female forest ranger, who claimed she was burning a letter from her ex-husband, and it got out of control. 137,000 acres.

7 posted on 08/03/2008 7:22:40 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson