Posted on 07/31/2008 5:48:38 PM PDT by sionnsar
But, but, but I thought it was impossible. How can it be?
IOW ...a perpetual motion device. YUP!
“Almost 100% efficiency” is only a perpetual-motion machine if that “almost” exceeds 100%. Below 100% it’s lossy, and if you believe that’s “perpetual motion” I have a Ponzi scheme I’d like to sell to you.
This is a poorly written article. It’s very difficult to figure out what they have done that hasn’t been done before.
Thanks for confirming that this wasn’t up to the EE Times’ standards of a few decades back...
I always thought a perpetual motion device had to have a net gain in energy. That is certainly not the case here as PV cells are at the low end of efficiency. Nanosolar claims to achieve 15% efficiency.
Ok, so you took the scientist’s statement out of context to show a bit of ignorance. Here’s what you missed.
PV cells only function well during sunlight (although Unisolar claims their amorphous crystal gets a buzz from moonlight, albeit nothing to capitalize on). The Sun’s energy is converted via PV cells to DC current and converted to AC power via an inverter. An overall solar system is pretty inefficient at about most 10%. But the energy is from the Sun, so is considered free and infinite. 10% from something free and infinite can be better than something that is 100% efficient from something not free and finite.
What the electrolysis component in the system chain this scientist is referring to as 100% efficient is a small part of the overall system which is grossly inefficient. After converting current to H2 in a near perfect process, the Fuel Cell that converts the hydrogen back to electricity is also prone to inefficiencies.
So if we calculate the total efficiency of the system, we are going to fall short quite a bit. But at least this scientist has claimed to solve one of the more important parts of the whole problem here. Let’s hope he is successful at getting it out of the lab soon.

We gotta let it out
Ore. ping
Or not (just from Ore. paper)
Too many unanswered questions. Smacks of University of Utah’s cold fusion.
Article is worthless.
I don't know why but they sure are making a big deal about using this with PV. That's what makes me suspicious. It would be very beneficial to make it easier to split water on a huge scale with electricity from any source.
 I wonder if this is any better than the large solar collectors that use molten salt to store energy.
for the renewable energy ping list
 I usually don't see photovoltaics used with the phrase "excess capacity."
IMHO, I think you have it backwards. Wikipedia has a decent discussion of catalysis and catalysts. Catalysts just lower the energy of activation to get a reaction going forward. Photovoltaic cells capture the sun's free energy. Generating hydrogen from the electrolysis of water captures the energy for storage it in the form of hydrogen. It's just a storage medium. How you apply it is different. You lose energy anytime you convert it from one form to another according to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, IIRC. It will be lost as heat, so you may want to use the electricity from the PV cell as directly as possible, storing excess power as hydrogen.
Whaddya think?
IOW ...a perpetual motion device. YUP!
Check the first link in comment# 15. Catalysis is not perpetual motion. The photovoltaic cell just captures free energy from the sun that is otherwise lost. The elctrolysis of water stores that energy in the form of hydrogen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.