And most Americans seem more than happy to simply watch our privacy slip away...
To: Politics4Fun
‘The Naked Society’ Vance Packard, 1965
Good section on 4th and 5th Amends to the Fed Constitution.
2 posted on
07/31/2008 4:05:17 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(Exxon Suxx)
To: Politics4Fun
Ceiling cat sees everything anyway....
/johnny
3 posted on
07/31/2008 4:06:19 PM PDT by
JRandomFreeper
(Bless us all, each, and every one.)
To: Politics4Fun
As sad as it is, they are right.
To: Politics4Fun
He’s right. And there’s not much you can do about it.
To: Politics4Fun
Good, lets all of us go and Google “Google” - find out who does what there and then post it all over ... really dig into their private lives ....
6 posted on
07/31/2008 4:08:33 PM PDT by
SkyDancer
("What Our Enemies Couldn't Do Our Politicians Will")
To: Politics4Fun
7 posted on
07/31/2008 4:13:31 PM PDT by
SumProVita
("Cogito ergo sum pro vita." .....updated Descartes)
To: Politics4Fun
8 posted on
07/31/2008 4:15:13 PM PDT by
SumProVita
("Cogito ergo sum pro vita." .....updated Descartes)
To: Politics4Fun
That's not true. I can understand why you would say it though! We have given up just about every privacy expectation in regards commercial transactions in the credit card electronic transaction era. The reason?
Convenience. The same thing with geographic position and speed monitoring like OnStar and now in cell phones -- safety and convenience in the event of unexpected events, accidents, danger, getting lost. Some call it out "data cloud" or "data shadow" or "data footprint" -- it has become huge!
That hugeness of the data is to some extent a mesh curtain -- it provides some privacy. But I agree -- we have given up on closed box privacy.
But what Americans still expect is a form of privacy based on politeness and modesty among those hold and filter that data. We are very upset when our personal data is made public.
THAT is what we MUST hold Google to account on. And hooray for the Pittsburgh family who are fighting this fight!
9 posted on
07/31/2008 4:15:21 PM PDT by
bvw
To: Politics4Fun
Google insists there is no privacy from Google. But Google is one of the most secretive corporations in America. For instance, it operates a huge “black box” complex along the Columbia River in Oregon that it refuses to publicly acknowledge.
10 posted on
07/31/2008 4:22:16 PM PDT by
mojito
To: Politics4Fun
Scott McNealy (Chairman of Sun Microsystems) interview
Q: A couple of years ago you made some comments about privacy — and the lack thereof — that were widely printed. That was amazingly pre-Patriot Act and pre-9/11. Do you stick by that notion? Should we not be worried about having lost all our privacy?
A: I never said that, did I?
Q: You said, “You already have no privacy.”
A: I said, “You have no privacy. Get over it.”
Q: What did you mean by that?
A: The point I was making was someone already has your medical records. Someone has my dental records. Someone has my financial records. Someone knows just about everything about me.
Gang, do you want to refute my statement? Visa knows what you bought. You have no privacy. Get over it. That’s what I said.
11 posted on
07/31/2008 4:33:03 PM PDT by
ari-freedom
(I support the Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus! http://zapatopi.net/treeoctopus/)
To: Politics4Fun
1776 The United States Of America a nation fouunded upon the Declaration of Independence and certain rights later specified in the Constitution
2008 The United States of America owned and operated by corporate board members and CEO's who tell our elected leaders and judges what laws, rights, and freedoms we do or do not have.
15 posted on
07/31/2008 4:45:06 PM PDT by
cva66snipe
($.01 The current difference between the DEM's and GOP as well as their combined worth to this nation)
To: Politics4Fun
I've always argued that there is no "right to privacy" in the US Constitution. But, Roe v. Wade, (410 U.S. 113) in 1973, before the United States Supreme Court resulted in a landmark decision regarding abortion finding that laws against abortion in the United States violated "a constitutional right to privacy under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment".
The opinion of the Roe Court, written by Justice Harry Blackmun asserted that the "right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is, or, as the District Court determined, in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of rights to the people, is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy."
The Roe majority rested its opinion squarely on the Constitution's due process clause and the "right of privacy".
Its either the law, or it ain't FRiends. Therefore, Googles cameras gotta go or Roe must be overturned, wouldn't ya think? The "hypocrisy is breathtaking".
17 posted on
07/31/2008 5:40:22 PM PDT by
Drumbo
("Democracy can withstand anything but democrats." - Jubal Harshaw (Robert A. Heinlein))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson