Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney
Thanks, but the discussion is on the application of combustion and the resulting efficiency.

The key word: "application". It is the application of combustion that is not 100% efficient. Just as the application of nuclear reactions is not 100% efficient.

200 posted on 08/01/2008 1:10:47 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]


To: ColdWater

I agree that neither is 100% efficient.

Efficiency in this application is a a comparison of energy into the system to the work performed.

Efficiency of an automobile is concerned with moving the vehicle. The rejected heat is energy but we disregard it in our measurement because it is not the work we are trying to accomplish.

I guess a nuclear bomb efficiency should be measured by the destructive force, which can be heat, force and radiation. Interesting but not really relevant to the topic of the thread.


205 posted on 08/01/2008 1:17:45 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson