Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JC85
ID is pure science—which has its place too. I have yet to see a real world application of string theory, which may or may not be true. That doesn’t mean string theory is not science—it’s just not applied science, at least not yet.

Please don't take this as it might sound, but as used in the above context, what do you mean by "pure science"? What do you mean by "applied science"? These are not leading questions. I am genuinely curious.

40 posted on 07/30/2008 9:19:03 PM PDT by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: yankeedame

I use the term in this sense:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_science

“Fundamental science is the part of science that describes the most basic objects, forces, relations between them and laws governing them, such that all other phenomena may be in principle derived from them, following the logic of scientific reductionism. There is a difference between fundamental or pure science and practical science; sometimes called by the two phases pure science and applied science.[1] Pure science, in contrast to applied science, is defined as a basic knowledge it develops. Basic science is the heart of all discoveries, and progress is based on well controlled experiments. Pure science is dependent upon deductions from demonstrated truths, or is studied without regard to practical applications.”


44 posted on 07/30/2008 9:25:38 PM PDT by JC85
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson